A critical review and analysis of the current research on the efficacy of the ventilator versus the manual resuscitation bag (MRB) as the method of delivering hyperoxygenation/hyperinflation breaths before, during, and/or after endotracheal suctioning (ETS) is presented. Current research findings indicate that hyperoxygenation/hyperinflation breaths at 100% oxygen (O2) delivered via the ventilator have resulted in elevated blood-O2 levels which are either superior or equivalent to the MRB in preventing suction-induced hypoxemia. Delivery of hyperoxygenation/hyperinflation breaths using the MRB results in increased airway pressure, and increased hemodynamic consequences. Guidelines of clinical practice, based on current research findings, are presented. Areas for further research are identified
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 August 1990
Respiratory Care in Adults|
August 01 1990
Ventilator versus Manual Resuscitation Bag as the Method for Delivering Hyperoxygenation before Endotracheal Suctioning
Kathleen S. Stone, RN, PhD, FAAN
From the Department of Life Span Process, The Ohio State University, College of Nursing, Columbus, Ohio.
Reprint requests to Kathleen S. Stone, RN, PhD, FAAN, Department of Life Span Process, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, 1585 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210-1289.
Search for other works by this author on:
AACN Adv Crit Care (1990) 1 (2): 289–299.
Citation
Kathleen S. Stone; Ventilator versus Manual Resuscitation Bag as the Method for Delivering Hyperoxygenation before Endotracheal Suctioning. AACN Adv Crit Care 1 August 1990; 1 (2): 289–299. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/15597768-1990-2007
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Short-term Access
Purchase short-term access on a pay-per-article or pay-per-issue basis.
$15 72 - hour single article access $30 7 - day full issue access