Each day, we generate hypotheses about our environment—our perceptions of people, our expectations of events, and our interpretation of images. These hypotheses provide a framework by which we interpret our experiences. The same is true for differential diagnosis by which health care practitioners develop hypotheses or diagnoses from a set of cues provided during an encounter with a patient. For clinicians to be successful at differential diagnosis, they must use a multidimensional and complex process involving nonanalytic and analytic cognitive processes and metacognition—thinking about thinking. Our conclusions, however, can lead to errors in diagnosis. Many of these errors are due to errors in cognition. The purpose of this article is to discuss this complex process, identify common errors in cognition, and offer strategies to prevent these common errors in differential diagnosis.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 July 2014
Differential Diagnoses for Select Critical Care Symptoms|
July 01 2014
Differential Diagnosis: Correctly Putting the Pieces of the Puzzle Together
Kristine Anne Scordo, RN, PhD, ACNP-BC
Kristine Anne Scordo, RN, PhD, ACNP-BC
Kristine Anne Scordo is Professor and Director, Adult-Gero Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Program, College of Nursing, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45324 ([email protected]).
Search for other works by this author on:
AACN Adv Crit Care (2014) 25 (3): 230–236.
Citation
Kristine Anne Scordo; Differential Diagnosis: Correctly Putting the Pieces of the Puzzle Together. AACN Adv Crit Care 1 July 2014; 25 (3): 230–236. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/NCI.0000000000000035
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Short-term Access
Purchase short-term access on a pay-per-article or pay-per-issue basis.
$15 72 - hour single article access $30 7 - day full issue access