A cute care clinicians’ exposure to excessive numbers of alarms, particularly those that are of no clinical importance or are false, results in sensory overload and a subsequent desensitization to those alarms. When desensitization occurs, alarm response may be delayed or absent. Patient deaths or other unfavorable outcomes can occur when serious clinical events detected by cardiac monitors or pulse oximeters are perceived as false, not acted upon with appropriate haste, or missed entirely. According to studies in physiologic monitor alarms for adults and children, 89% to 99% of electrocardiographic (ECG) monitor alarms are clinically insignificant or false.1,2 To date, strategies to reduce alarms and the resulting fatigue have focused on the ECG and oxygen saturation alarms resulting in limited evidence existing to guide practice, particularly for pediatric patients. To minimize alarm fatigue successfully, units must analyze factors leading to alarm burden and select interventions that address...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Summer 2018
Pediatric Perspectives|
June 15 2018
Minimizing Alarm Fatigue: Pediatric Perspective
Lori Williams, DNP, RN, RNC-NIC, CCRN, NNP-BC
Lori Williams, DNP, RN, RNC-NIC, CCRN, NNP-BC
Department Editor
Lori Williams is Clinical Nurse Specialist, Universal Care Unit and Float Team, American Family Children’s Hospital, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, 1675 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792 ([email protected]).
Search for other works by this author on:
AACN Adv Crit Care (2018) 29 (2): 204–207.
Citation
Lori Williams; Minimizing Alarm Fatigue: Pediatric Perspective. AACN Adv Crit Care 1 January 2018; 29 (2): 204–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2018946
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Short-term Access
Purchase short-term access on a pay-per-article or pay-per-issue basis.
$15 72 - hour single article access $30 7 - day full issue access