The ethical conundrums that arise in the care of critically ill people are diverse, complex, and challenging. They can involve value conflicts around goals of care or inadequate informed consent, allocation of scarce resources including staff, inequities in access to critical care interventions, and myriad others. Often there are no clear or satisfying resolutions to these complex issues. The vestiges of them remain as moral residue even when we have done our best—all things considered. The moral residue can manifest in a variety of ways including physical, emotional, spiritual, and moral consequences. We may be unable to name the source of our moral suffering or identify the moral adversity that produced it. Or we may be stuck in an endless cycle of questions or grievances that leave us powerless and exhausted. We often wonder: How do I restore my integrity and wholeness in response to the persistent moral residue? How...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Winter 2024
Ethics in Critical Care|
December 15 2024
Phases of Suffering: A Roadmap for Moral Repair
Cynda Hylton Rushton, PhD, RN, FAAN
Cynda Hylton Rushton, PhD, RN, FAAN
Department Editor
Cynda Hylton Rushton is Anne and George L. Bunting Professor of Clinical Ethics and Nursing, School of Nursing and Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, 525 N Wolfe St, Box 420, Baltimore, MD 21205 ([email protected]).
Search for other works by this author on:
AACN Adv Crit Care (2024) 35 (4): 366–373.
Citation
Cynda Hylton Rushton; Phases of Suffering: A Roadmap for Moral Repair. AACN Adv Crit Care 15 December 2024; 35 (4): 366–373. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2024795
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Short-term Access
Purchase short-term access on a pay-per-article or pay-per-issue basis.
$15 72 - hour single article access $30 7 - day full issue access
32
Views