Dr Howard Karl Butcher creates this opportunity for a critical dialogue on classification systems in his letter commenting on my Current Controversies in Critical Care column titled “Designing Formal Classification Systems to Better Articulate Knowledge, Skills, and Meanings in Nursing Practice” (September 2004;13:426–430). In this response to Dr Butcher’s thoughtful letter, I hope to clarify points of misunderstanding and extend the dialogue. The thesis of the column is that every classification system designed for indexing and retrieving records and communicating and documenting nursing work creates a particular view of practice. The particular view of practice that spawned the classification system has an inner logic. With continued use, that inner logic becomes reified and increasingly invisible as the classification system becomes a taken-for-granted understanding and approach to practice. The column warns that practitioners must be astute and critical of the unwitting styles of practice that are created as a result of...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 May 2005
Current Controversies in Critical Care|
May 01 2005
Extending the Dialogue About Classification Systems and the Work of Professional Nurses
Patricia Benner, RN, PhD
Patricia Benner, RN, PhD
Thelma Shobe Endowed Chair for Ethical and Spiritual Dimensions of Nursing
The University of California, San Francisco, Calif, School of Nursing, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Search for other works by this author on:
Am J Crit Care (2005) 14 (3): 242–272.
Citation
Patricia Benner; Extending the Dialogue About Classification Systems and the Work of Professional Nurses. Am J Crit Care 1 May 2005; 14 (3): 242–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2005.14.3.242
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Short-term Access
Purchase short-term access on a pay-per-article or pay-per-issue basis.
$15 72 - hour single article access $30 7 - day full issue access