As the latest offering in the discussion of family presence in critical care units, a review of research on the presence of patients’ family members during cardiopulmonary resuscitation was recently published. By organizing the literature in this review on the basis of the ethical perspectives of the researchers, the author, Margo Halm,1 locates the discussion of family presence in the realm of ethics and values. Of the 28 research reports she reviewed, 23 supported family presence during resuscitation by arguing from a utilitarian (teleological) stance that allowing family presence is the right action because it results in more overall benefit than does not allowing family presence. In response to the suggestion that family presence can be defended by a utilitarian argument, I would like to unpack some of the basic tenets of utilitarian theory, discuss its appeal as the basis for a normative healthcare ethics, and describe the problems...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 March 2006
Current Controversies in Critical Care|
March 01 2006
Family Involvement in Critical Care: Shortcomings of a Utilitarian Justification
Lisa Day, RN, CNS, PhD
Lisa Day, RN, CNS, PhD
The University of California, San Francisco, School of Nursing, Department of Physiological Nursing.
Search for other works by this author on:
Am J Crit Care (2006) 15 (2): 223–225.
Citation
Lisa Day; Family Involvement in Critical Care: Shortcomings of a Utilitarian Justification. Am J Crit Care 1 March 2006; 15 (2): 223–225. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2006.15.2.223
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Short-term Access
Purchase short-term access on a pay-per-article or pay-per-issue basis.
$15 72 - hour single article access $30 7 - day full issue access