BACKGROUND: Patients who are comatose or semicomatose are at risk of corneal dryness and ulceration. OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate the effectiveness of two treatments used for the prevention of corneal epithelial breakdown in critically ill patients. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was used. The sample consisted of critically ill patients (age, 15-84 years) with a limited or absent blink reflex in a 14-bed general intensive care unit in a large metropolitan teaching hospital. Ninety-six eligible patients were studied; of these, 36 were excluded and data from the remaining 60 patients were analyzed. Patients were randomized to receive methylcellulose lubricating drops every 2 hours (n = 30) or to have their eyes covered with a polyethylene film to create a moisture chamber (n = 30). The patients' corneas were tested daily for epithelial breakdown using fluorescein drops. Patients were studied for a minimum of 48 hours and a maximum of 1 week. RESULTS: Eight of the 30 patients in the lubricating drop group had positive fluorescein staining, compared with one in the moisture chamber group. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a moisture chamber is more effective than lubricating drops in preventing corneal epithelial breakdown in critically ill patients with limited or absent blink reflex.
Skip Nav Destination
Articles| November 01 1995
Moisture chamber versus lubrication for the prevention of corneal epithelial breakdown
Am J Crit Care (1995) 4 (6): 425–428.
D Cortese, L Capp, S McKinley; Moisture chamber versus lubrication for the prevention of corneal epithelial breakdown. Am J Crit Care 1 November 1995; 4 (6): 425–428. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc19188.8.131.525
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register