BACKGROUND: Acute pain is a significant problem in critical care patients. Although many barriers to successful assessment and management of pain in critical care patients have been noted, little is known about how critical care nurses make clinical judgments when assessing and managing patients' pain. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative analysis is part of a pilot study evaluating nurses' use of a pain assessment and intervention notation algorithm in patients in critical care areas who have limited communication abilities after abdominal or thoracic surgery. METHOD: Transcribed audiotapes of nurse participants' "thinking aloud" while using the pain assessment and intervention notation algorithm were analyzed by using interpretive phenomenology. The interpretive account is based on 31 tape recordings of 14 nurses caring for 41 patients (12 patients in the ICU and 29 patients in the postanesthesia care unit). FINDINGS: The two domains of clinical judgment found were (1) assessing the patient and (2) balancing interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Many nurses' reports showed that they accurately assessed their patients' needs for analgesics. Through testing of and learning from their patients' responses, nurses were able to give amounts of analgesics that diminished patients' postoperative pain. Additionally, nurses had to balance analgesic administration against the patients' hemodynamic and respiratory conditions, medical plan and prescriptions, and the desires of the patients and the patients' families.
Clinical judgment and management of postoperative pain in critical care patients
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Tools Icon Tools
- Search Site
D Stannard, K Puntillo, C Miaskowski, S Gleeson, K Kehrle, P Nye; Clinical judgment and management of postoperative pain in critical care patients. Am J Crit Care 1 November 1996; 5 (6): 433–441. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc19184.108.40.2063
Download citation file: