The current debate about the merits of null hypothesis significance testing, even though provocative, is not particularly novel. The significance testing approach has had defenders and opponents for decades, especially within the social sciences, where reliance on the use of significance testing has historically been heavy. The primary concerns have been (1) the misuse of significance testing, (2) the misinterpretation of P values, and (3) the lack of accompanying statistics, such as effect sizes and confidence intervals, that would provide a broader picture into the researcher's data analysis and interpretation. This article presents the current thinking, both in favor and against, on significance testing, the virtually unanimous support for reporting effect sizes alongside P values, and the overall implications for practice and application.
Skip Nav Destination
Articles| September 01 1999
The controversy of significance testing: misconceptions and alternatives
Am J Crit Care (1999) 8 (5): 291–296.
DN Glaser; The controversy of significance testing: misconceptions and alternatives. Am J Crit Care 1 September 1999; 8 (5): 291–296. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc1922.214.171.1241
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
AACN AccountSign In
Sign in via your InstitutionSign in via your Institution
Subscribe online and gain access to the entire archive.
Purchase short-term access on a pay-per-article or pay-per-issue basis.
$15 72 - hour single article access $30 7 - day full issue access