In critical care, the short peripheral intravenous catheter is an essential venous access route, often used in emergency situations to administer high-risk medications and fluid resuscitation. This route of administration is generally viewed as routine and benign. However, a growing body of evidence indicates that the risks inherent to this route are much higher than reported and represent a significant area of patient harm. Few standardized definitions and surveillance methods exist for peripheral intravenous catheter–related complications such as phlebitis, bloodstream infection, and extravasation. Recommendations for peripheral intravenous catheter replacement are based on clinical indications rather than routine replacement, so standards of practice for catheter insertion and management must be consistently applied. This article reviews recent studies that challenge the need for central catheter placement for vasopressor therapy, current knowledge of peripheral intravenous catheter–related adverse events, and evidence-based standards of care for short peripheral intravenous catheter insertion and maintenance.
Skip Nav Destination
Cover| December 01 2019
Peripheral Intravenous Administration of High-Risk Infusions in Critical Care: A Risk-Benefit Analysis
Barb Nickel, APRN-CNS, CCRN, CRNI
Barb Nickel is the critical care clinical nurse specialist for CHI Health St. Francis, Grand Island, Nebraska. She is a member of the Infusion Nurses Society Standards of Practice Committee.
Corresponding author: Barb Nickel, aprn-cns, ccrn, crni, Health St. Francis, 2620 W. Faidley Ave, Grand Island, NE 68803 (email: firstname.lastname@example.org).
Search for other works by this author on:
Crit Care Nurse (2019) 39 (6): 16–28.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
Barb Nickel; Peripheral Intravenous Administration of High-Risk Infusions in Critical Care: A Risk-Benefit Analysis. Crit Care Nurse 1 December 2019; 39 (6): 16–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2019443
Download citation file: