ST-segment monitoring can enable the detection of silent ischemia and result in changes in clinical management.16  Changes in the ST segment also add prognostic information that can potentially influence treatment decisions.715  Although the evidence supports the treatment of detected myocardial ischemia, no randomized clinical trials have been done to test the effect of continuous ST-segment monitoring on clinical outcomes. Ischemia is present in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS, unstable angina) and is also potentially present in noncardiac critically ill patients and in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery who have coronary disease or cardiac risk factors.2,4,5,1632 

A lack of awareness is apparent with respect to recommendations for ST-segment monitoring, and ST-segment monitoring is underused in clinical practice.33,34  Accurate ST-segment monitoring requires nurses to have a high level of knowledge and skill for accuracy and for effective clinical decision-making. Deficits in nursing knowledge related to the assessment of injury and ischemia based on changes in ST segments and T waves have been documented.3538 

  1. Ensure proper placement of electrodes to obtain accurate diagnosis of cardiac rhythm (Figure 1). Palpate patient to ensure proper intercostal spaces. Electrodes should be placed under the breast tissue in women. [level B]

    graphic

    graphic

  2. Provide proper skin preparation for electrocardiography (ECG) electrodes; change ECG electrodes daily. [level B]

  3. Once proper placement of the leads has been determined, skin can be marked with indelible ink to ensure that electrodes are returned to the same correct location if they are removed. Location should be marked only after the accuracy of the electrode placement is verified. [level D]

  4. Perform ST-segment monitoring for patients with confirmed or suspected ACS for at least 48 hours. [level B]

  5. Consider ST-segment monitoring in patients after elective percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac surgery. [level D]

  6. Consider ST-segment monitoring useful in critically ill patients at risk for supply and demand ischemia, in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery who have coronary artery disease or risk factors for coronary artery disease, and in all patients undergoing vascular surgery. [level B]

  7. Select monitoring leads according to the patient’s needs and risk for ischemia and/or dysrhythmia, especially when only limited monitoring leads are available. [level B]

  8. Use continuous ST-segment monitoring of all 12 leads or ST-segment mapping if available. [level B]

  9. Use leads known to show recent injury or ischemia in patients with ACS and in patients who have had percutaneous coronary intervention. Known leads with ECG changes are referred to as the patient’s “ST fingerprint.” [level B]

  10. Lead selection (see Table). [level B]

    • Recognize that ST-segment depression in a particular lead being monitored can represent ischemia or it can represent ST-segment depression that is reciprocal to ST-segment elevation in another lead that is not being monitored.

    • Use a recommended dysrhythmia monitoring lead (V1) and a recommended ST-segment monitoring lead (see Table) in patients with ACS who are at risk for ventricular arrhythmias.

  11. Evaluate the ST segment with the patient supine and the head of the bed elevated less than 45°. [level C]

  12. Set the ST alarm parameter 1 mm or less above and below the patient’s baseline ST segment in all leads except for leads V2 and V3, where the upper alarm limit can be set 1.5 mm from baseline in women and 2.0 mm from baseline in men. [level C]

  13. Set the isoelectric point and the ST-segment measurement point (60 milliseconds beyond the J point) before the start of ST-segment monitoring. [level E]

  14. Do not adjust alarm limits for changes in the ST segment if a patient is being monitored to “rule out” ischemia or for potential ischemia. Alarm limits should remain set on the basis of the patient’s admission baseline. The goal is to capture changes that trigger the alarms on the basis of the original baseline ST segment. [level D]

  15. Reset alarm limits only in response to a good alarm. A good alarm is when ST-segment deviation evolves or resolves in a patient with known ACS. [level D]

  16. Perform further assessment in response to a valid ST-segment alarm where the ST-segment deviation lasts more than a full minute. Further assessment of patients includes (a) analysis of the graphic recording (Figure 2), (b) ensuring supine positioning of patients and proper electrode placement, (c) assessment of patients’ symptoms, and (d) 12-lead ECG. [level D]

  17. Report the finding of a new left bundle branch as the potential equivalent of an ST-segment myocardial infarction. [level B]

Figure 1

Placement of electrodes.

Figure 1

Placement of electrodes.

Close modal
Table

Lead selection

Lead selection
Lead selection
Figure 2

A, Normal electrocardiographic (ECG) complex shows TP segment and PR segment, which may be used as reference points for the isoelectric line. The ST segment is measured at 0.06 seconds after the J point. This ST segment is isoelectric. B, ECG complex shows ST-segment depression of almost 5 mm. C, ST-segment elevation of approximately 4 mm is depicted.

Figure 2

A, Normal electrocardiographic (ECG) complex shows TP segment and PR segment, which may be used as reference points for the isoelectric line. The ST segment is measured at 0.06 seconds after the J point. This ST segment is isoelectric. B, ECG complex shows ST-segment depression of almost 5 mm. C, ST-segment elevation of approximately 4 mm is depicted.

Close modal

Nurse Awareness, Education, and Competency

  1. In addition to the lack of awareness and underuse of ST-segment monitoring, gaps in knowledge and skill related to ST-segment monitoring are apparent.3341  [level C]

  2. Successful implementation of ST-segment monitoring requires nurse education (knowledge and skill building), process implementation, competency assessment, and ongoing quality improvement monitoring.1,37,38,4249  [level B]

Electrode Placement

  1. Continuous 12-lead monitoring and ST mapping systems may use altered electrode placement to obtain a derived ECG. Electrode placement for derived ECGs is according to the manufacturer’s recommendation and differs from that used in the standard 12-lead ECG. The ST map collects ST values and trends derived from both limb leads and horizontal leads and creates an integrated display.36,5053  [level C]

  2. Changing electrode placement can result in a change in the ST-segment measurement and may produce a false alarm.54  [level C]

  3. Failure to prepare the skin properly before placing the electrodes may cause the monitoring alarms to sound erroneously. Preparation may include carefully clipping hair in areas where electrodes are to be placed and/or cleaning the skin with alcohol to remove skin oils.50,5456  [level C]

  4. Expert consensus recommends marking the locations of the electrodes with indelible ink to ensure that electrodes can be replaced in their original locations if they are removed for any reason. ECG information obtained from electrodes located close to the heart (precordial leads) is especially prone to waveform changes when the electrodes are relocated as little as 1 cm away from the original locations. It is imperative that marking accurate electrode placement with indelible ink be done only by clinicians who are trained and competent in accurate placement of electrodes.40,54,57  [level C]

Use of ST-Segment Monitoring

  1. ST-segment monitoring can be used to assess for successful reperfusion or reocclusion in an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.51,5864  [level B]

  2. ST-segment monitoring is useful for detecting ischemia in potential or actual ACS, including silent ischemia. In most ST-segment monitoring studies, monitoring was done for 24 to 48 hours. ST-segment monitoring is more sensitive than patients’ self-reporting of symptoms because most episodes of myocardial ischemia detected with ECG are clinically silent.25,710,16,17,50,52,58,6567  [level B]

Selection of Patients for ST-Segment Monitoring

  1. Ischemia detected during ST-segment monitoring in patients with ACS is associated with increased risk. Assessment of increased risk by ST-segment monitoring may affect clinical decision-making and should be performed for 48 hours after presentation.4,6,1115,18,6877  [level B]

  2. A new left bundle branch may represent the presence of an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and should be reported. Although ST-segment monitoring has not been recommended in patients with an existing left bundle branch, it can be useful in differentiating those with and without myocardial infarction in patients in whom infarction is suspected. The presence of a right bundle branch is not a contraindication to ST-segment monitoring.64,78  [level C]

  3. Several studies have demonstrated silent myocardial ischemia in patients who are critically ill, including ischemia during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Additionally, several studies have identified perioperative ischemia during vascular surgery or during other noncardiac surgeries in patients with coronary artery disease. It is useful in these populations of patients to use ST-segment monitoring as a noninvasive tool to detect ischemia as part of the patient’s assessment and determination of risk.1932  [level B]

  4. The goal of monitoring must be considered for each patient. For instance, in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the goal of ST-segment monitoring is to observe rapid ST-segment recovery (back to isoelectric) within the 1 hour of treatment and to observe the appropriate evolutionary changes of the ST segment and T wave in the subsequent 48 hours or more. Conversely, in patients with non-ST elevation ACS, the goal is to detect transient or recurrent changes in the ST segment.9  Additionally, patients with ACS are also at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias and will require diligent dysrhythmia monitoring.54,64,76  [level E]

Lead Selection

  1. Research demonstrates that monitoring for ST-segment changes in multiple leads, preferably 12 leads, substantially improves the chance of identifying ischemic events. ST-segment mapping may also increase nurses’ use of ST-segment monitoring. It is important to know that if only 2 channels are available for viewing, the monitor may be capable of assessing the ST segment in all other available leads. Although the recordings of these additional leads are not viewed, there can be a digital display of the ST-segment measurement. For example, in a 5-lead system with ST-segment monitoring capabilities, the monitor can assess 1 chest lead and all 6 limb leads simultaneously.36,5053  [level B]

  2. If all 12 leads are not available in the bedside monitor, use the patient’s “ST fingerprint” to select the best ECG lead(s), which show maximal ST-segment deviation. An ST fingerprint is defined as the pattern of ST-segment elevation and/or depression unique to a particular patient depending on the anatomic site of coronary occlusion. A fingerprint can be obtained during known ischemia (ST-elevation myocardial infarction) or during percutaneous coronary intervention.50,54,5860,62,79  [level B]

  3. If only 2 leads are available for ST-segment monitoring, and an ST fingerprint is not available, leads III (or aVF) and V3 (or V2) are recommended for patients with suspected ACS. Leads III and aVF are the preferred leads for concern with the inferior wall of the left ventricle or with the right coronary artery. Leads V3 and V2 are the preferred leads for concern with the anterior wall of the left ventricle or the left anterior descending artery. A combination of leads covers the distribution of 2 of the 3 major epicardial arteries. If there is concern for the low lateral wall or the left circumflex artery, lead V6 is the preferred lead.50,54,58,8082  [level B]

  4. Lead V4R should be assessed in patients with acute inferior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction to assess for coexisting right ventricular myocardial infarction because right ventricular infarcts have special treatment considerations.8387  [level C]

  5. Lead V5 or lead V4 is valuable for identifying demand-related ischemia in patients undergoing vascular surgery or in patients with coronary disease or risk factors who are undergoing noncardiac surgical procedures, or in critically ill patients at risk for supply and demand ischemia.19,29,30,88  [level C]

Positioning of Patients

  1. Because a change in body position (lying on right or left side) can alter the ST segment, mimicking ischemia, when an ST alarm sounds and the patient is found in a side-lying position, the patient should be returned to the supine position. If the ST-segment deviation persists with the patient supine, it should be considered indicative of myocardial ischemia. If possible, obtain “positional 12-lead ECGs” with the patient assuming right- and left-side lying positions at the start of ST-segment monitoring. These positional ECGs can be used to identify false ST-segment changes.10,50,54,58,89,90  [level C]

Setting Alarm Parameters and Measurement

  1. Set the ST alarm parameter 1 mm or less above and below the patient’s baseline ST segment in all leads except for leads V2 and V3, where the upper alarm limit can be 1.5 mm from baseline in women and 2.0 mm from baseline in men. Baseline ST-segment elevation of 1 to 2 mm is common in leads V2 and V3; however, ST segments in the limb leads are normally more isoelectric. For this reason, subtle ST-segment elevation in the limb leads can represent an early acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Transient ST-segment changes of more than 0.5 mm during symptoms at rest is strongly suggestive of ischemia and the presence of severe coronary artery disease. Marked symmetrical precordial T-wave inversion (> 2 mm) suggests acute ischemia, particularly ischemia due to a critical stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.76,9194  [level C]

  2. Measure ST-segment changes 60 milliseconds beyond the J point of the ECG complex.54  [level E]

When replacing current bedside monitoring equipment, ensure that units caring for patients who have indications for continuous ischemia monitoring have ST-segment monitoring capabilities.

Review organization policies and protocols related to cardiac monitoring to ensure the same standard of care across settings.

Provide appropriate initial and continuing education for staff, including but not limited to electrode placement, lead selection, ECG recognition of injury and ischemia, technical considerations for ST-segment monitoring, ACS, and clinical implications for ischemia. Include didactic content and “hands-on” practice with return demonstration of lead placement.

Develop competency standards for all staff involved in the monitoring process to ensure patient safety and effective ST-segment monitoring.

Conduct audits at regular intervals to ensure actual practice matches recommended practice for ST-segment monitoring of appropriate patients, appropriate lead selection, appropriate ST-alarm parameters, and appropriate response to alarms.

  1. Go to www.aacn.org, click Clinical Resources, and scroll down to select AACN Practice Resource Network.

  2. Review the standards. AHA Scientific Statement: Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Hospital Settings. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/110/17/2721.full.pdf+html. Accessed July 14, 2016.

  3. AACN Practice Alert: Alarm Management. http://www.aacn.org/wd/practice/content/practicealerts/alarm-management-practice-alert.pcms?menu=practice.

1
Daleiden
AM
,
Schell
H
.
Setting a new gold standard: ST-segment monitoring provides early detection of myocardial ischemia
.
Am J Nurs
.
2001
;
101
:
4
8
.
2
Drew
BJ
,
Pelter
MM
,
Adams
MG
,
Wung
SF
.
12-lead ST-segment monitoring vs single-lead maximum ST-segment monitoring for detecting ongoing ischemia in patients with unstable coronary syndromes
.
Am J Crit Care
.
1998
;
7
(
5
):
355
.
3
Kucia
AM
,
Stewart
S
,
Dip
G
.
The role of ST-segment monitoring in assessment of acute myocardial infarction
.
Dimens Crit Care Nurs
.
1999
;
18
(
5
):
12
18
.
4
Cohn
PF
,
Fox
KM
,
Daly
C
.
Silent myocardial ischemia
.
Circulation
.
2003
;
108
(
10
):
1263
1277
.
5
Tzivoni
D
,
Krucoff
MW
.
Continuous ST-segment monitoring in contemporary acute coronary syndrome patients: the magic of MERLIN– TIMI 36
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
2009
;
53
(
16
):
1422
1424
.
6
Jernberg
T
,
Abrahamsson
P
,
Lindahl
B
,
Johanson
P
,
Wallentin
L
,
Dellborg
M
.
Continuous multilead ST-monitoring identifies patients with unstable coronary artery disease who benefit from extended antithrombotic treatment
.
Eur Heart J
.
2002
;
23
(
14
):
1093
1101
.
7
Gottlieb
SO
,
Weisfeldt
ML
,
Ouyang
P
,
Mellits
ED
,
Gerstenblith
G
.
Silent ischemia as a marker for early unfavorable outcomes in patients with unstable angina
.
N Engl J Med
.
1986
;
314
(
19
):
1214
1219
.
8
Canto
JG
,
Shlipak
MG
,
Rogers
WJ
, et al
.
Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and mortality among patients with myocardial infarction presenting without chest pain
.
JAMA
.
2000
;
283
(
24
):
3223
3229
.
9
Pelter
MM
,
Adams
MG
,
Drew
BJ
.
Association of transient myocardial ischemia with adverse in-hospital outcomes for angina patients treated in a telemetry unit or a coronary care unit
.
Am J Crit Care
.
2002
;
11
(
4
):
318
325
.
10
Pelter
MM
,
Adams
MG
,
Drew
BJ
.
Transient myocardial ischemia is an independent predictor of adverse in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated in the telemetry unit
.
Heart Lung
.
2003
;
32
(
2
):
71
78
.
11
Langer
A
,
Singh
N
,
Freeman
MR
,
Tibshirani
R
,
Armstrong
PW
.
Detection of silent ischemia adds to the prognostic value of coronary anatomy and left ventricular function in predicting outcome in unstable angina patients
.
Can J Cardiol
.
1995
;
11
(
2
):
117
122
.
12
Rouse
CL
.
Prognostic significance of ST segment shift early after resolution of ST elevation in patients with myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy
.
AACN Nurs Scan Crit Care
.
1998
;
8
(
4
):
6
.
13
Jernberg
T
,
Lindahl
B
,
Wallentin
L
.
ST-segment monitoring with continuous 12-lead ECG improves early risk stratification in patients with chest pain and ECG nondiagnostic of acute myocardial infarction
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
1999
;
34
(
5
):
1413
1419
.
14
Nørgaard
BL
,
Andersen
K
,
Dellborg
M
,
Abrahamsson
P
,
Ravkilde
J
,
Thygesen
K
.
Admission risk assessment by cardiac troponin T in unstable coronary artery disease: additional prognostic information from continuous ST segment monitoring
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
1999
;
33
(
6
):
1519
1527
.
15
Akkerhuis
KM
,
Klootwijk
PA
,
Lindeboom
W
, et al
.
Recurrent ischaemia during continuous multilead ST-segment monitoring identifies patients with acute coronary syndromes at high risk of adverse cardiac events; meta-analysis of three studies
.
Eur Heart J
.
2001
;
22
(
21
):
1997
2006
.
16
Martinez
EA
,
Kim
LJ
,
Faraday
N
, et al
.
Sensitivity of routine intensive care unit surveillance for detecting myocardial ischemia
.
Crit Care Med
.
2003
;
31
(
9
):
2302
2308
.
17
Pelter
MM
,
Kozik
TM
,
Al-Zaiti
SS
,
Carey
MG
.
Acute coronary syndrome ST-segment monitoring
.
Am J Crit Care
.
2014
;
23
(
6
):
503
504
.
18
Scirica
BM
,
Morrow
DA
,
Budaj
A
, et al
.
Ischemia detected on continuous electrocardiography after acute coronary syndrome: observations from the MERLIN–TIMI 36 (Metabolic Efficiency With Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 36) trial
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
2009
;
53
(
16
):
1411
1421
.
19
Booker
KJ
,
Holm
K
,
Drew
BJ
, et al
.
Frequency and outcomes of transient myocardial ischemia in critically ill adults admitted for noncardiacconditions
.
Am J Crit Care
.
2003
;
12
:
508
517
.
20
Landesberg
G
,
Vesselov
Y
,
Einav
S
,
Goodman
S
,
Sprung
CL
,
Weissman
C
.
Myocardial ischemia, cardiac troponin, and long-term survival of high-cardiac risk critically ill intensive care unit patients
.
Crit Care Med
.
2005
;
33
(
6
):
1281
1287
.
21
Fox
L
,
Kirkendall
C
,
Craney
M
.
Continuous ST-segment monitoring in the intensive care unit
.
Crit Care Nurse
.
2010
;
30
(
5
):
33
43
.
22
Hurford
WE
,
Lynch
KE
,
Strauss
HW
,
Lowenstein
E
,
Zapol
WM
.
Myocardial perfusion as assessed by thallium-201 scintigraphy during the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation in ventilator-dependent patients
.
Anesthesiology
.
1991
;
74
(
6
):
1007
1016
.
23
Hurford
WE
,
Favorito
F
.
Association of myocardial ischemia with failure to wean from mechanical ventilation
.
Crit Care Med
.
1995
;
23
(
9
):
1475
1480
.
24
Chatila
W
,
Ani
S
,
Guaglianone
D
, et al
.
Cardiac ischemia during weaning from mechanical ventilation
.
Chest
.
1996
;
109
:
1577
1583
.
25
Srivastava
S
,
Chatila
W
,
Amoateng-Adjepong
Y
, et al
.
Myocardial ischemia and weaning failure in patients with coronary artery disease: an update
.
Crit Care Med
.
1999
;
27
:
2109
2122
.
26
Frazier
SK
,
Brom
H
,
Widener
J
, et al
.
Prevalence of myocardial ischemia during mechanical ventilation and weaning and its effects on weaning success
.
Heart Lung
.
2006
;
35
:
363
373
.
27
Kress
JP
,
Vinayak
AG
,
Levitt
J
, et al
.
Daily sedative interruption in mechanically ventilated patients at risk for coronary artery disease
.
Crit Care Med
.
2007
;
35
(
2
):
365
371
.
28
Pasternack
PF
,
Grossi
EA
,
Baumann
FG
, et al
.
The value of silent myocardial ischemia monitoring in the prediction of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery
.
J Vasc Surg
.
1989
;
10
(
6
):
617
625
.
29
Landesberg
G
,
Luria
MH
,
Cotev
S
, et al
.
Importance of long duration postoperative ST segment depression in cardiac morbidity after vascular surgery
.
Lancet
.
1993
;
341
:
715
719
.
30
Landesberg
G
,
Mosseri
M
,
Wolf
Y
,
Vesselov
Y
,
Weissman
C
.
Perioperative myocardial ischemia and infarction: identification by continuous 12-lead electrocardiogram with online ST-segment monitoring
.
Anesthesiology
.
2002
;
96
(
2
):
264
270
.
31
Fleisher
LA
,
Beckman
JA
,
Brown
KA
, et al
.
ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 2002 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery) developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.; Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology.; Society for Vascular Surgery
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
2007
;
50
(
17
):
e159
e242
.
32
Rodrigues
LB
,
Batista
A
,
Monteiro
F
,
Duarte
JS
.
ST-segment elevation during general anesthesia for non-cardiac surgery: a case of takotsubo
.
Braz J Anesthesiol
.
2015
;
65
(
5
):
403
406
.
33
Patton
JA
,
Funk
M
.
Survey of use of ST-segment monitoring in patients with acute coronary syndromes
.
Am J Crit Care
.
2001
;
10
(
1
):
23
.
34
Funk
M
,
Winkler
CG
,
May
JL
, et al
.
Unnecessary arrhythmia monitoring and underutilization of ischemia and QT interval monitoring in current clinical practice: baseline results of the Practical Use of the Latest Standards for Electrocardiography trial
.
J Electrocardiol
.
2010
;
43
(
6
):
542
547
.
35
Stephens
KE
,
Anderson
H
,
Carey
MG
,
Pelter
MM
.
Interpreting 12-lead electrocardiograms for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: what nurses know
.
J Cardiovasc Nurs
.
2007
;
22
(
3
):
186
193
.
36
Sangkachand
P
,
Sarosario
B
,
Funk
M
.
Continuous ST-segment monitoring: nurses’ attitudes, practices, and quality of patient care
.
Am J Crit Care
.
2011
;
20
(
3
):
226
238
.
37
Chronister
C
.
Improving nurses’ knowledge of continuous ST-segment monitoring
.
AACN Adv Crit Care
.
2014
;
25
(
2
):
104
113
.
38
Blakeman
JR
,
Sarsfield
K
,
Booker
KJ
.
Nurses’ practices and lead selection in monitoring for myocardial ischemia: an evidence-based quality improvement project
.
Dimens Crit Care Nurs
.
2015
;
34
(
4
):
189
195
.
39
Flanders
SA
.
Continuous ST-segment monitoring: raising the bar
.
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am
.
2006
;
18
(
2
):
169
177
.
40
Wenger
W
,
Kligfield
P
.
Variability of precordial electrode placement during routine electrocardiography
.
J Electrocardiol
.
1996
;
29
(
3
):
179
184
.
41
Sandau
KE
,
Sendelbach
S
,
Frederickson
J
,
Doran
K
.
National survey of cardiologists’ standard of practice for continuous ST-segment monitoring
.
Am J Crit Care
.
2010
;
19
(
2
):
112
123
.
42
Drew
BJ
,
Wung
SF
,
Adams
MG
,
Pelter
MM
.
Bedside diagnosis of myocardial ischemia with ST-segment monitoring technology: measurement issues for real-time clinical decision making and trial designs
.
J Electrocardiol
.
1998
;
30
:
157
165
.
43
Crater
SW
,
Taylor
CA
,
Maas
AC
, et al
.
Real-time application of continuous 12-lead ST-segment monitoring: 3 case studies
.
Crit Care Nurs
.
2000
;
20
(
2
):
93
99
.
44
Flanders
SA
.
ST-segment monitoring: putting standards into practice
.
AACN Adv Crit Care
.
2007
;
18
(
3
):
275
284
.
45
Schnell-Hoehn
K
,
Avery
L
.
Looking past the heart rhythm: continuous ST-segment monitoring for adults
.
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs
.
2009
;
20
(
4
):
10
14
.
46
Sandau
KE
,
Smith
M
.
Continuous ST-segment monitoring: protocol for practice
.
Crit Care Nurse
.
2009
;
29
(
4
):
39
49
.
47
Sandau
KE
,
Smith
M
.
Continuous ST-segment monitoring: 3 case studies in progressive care
.
Crit Care Nurse
.
2009
;
29
(
5
):
18
27
.
48
Evenson
L
,
Farnsworth
M
.
Skilled cardiac monitoring at the bedside: an algorithm for success
.
Crit Care Nurse
.
2010
;
30
(
5
):
14
22
.
49
Aust
MP
.
Continuous ST-segment monitoring
.
Am J Crit Care
.
2011
;
20
(
3
):
239
.
50
Drew
BJ
,
Krucoff
MW
.
For the ST-Segment Monitoring Practice Guideline International Working Group. Multi-lead ST-segment monitoring in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a consensus statement for healthcare professionals
.
Am J Crit Care
.
1999
;
8
(
6
):
372
388
.
51
Veldkamp
RF
,
Green
CL
,
Wilkins
ML
, et al
.
Comparison of continuous ST- segment recovery analysis with methods using static electrocardiograms for noninvasive patency assessment during acute myocardial infarction: Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) 7 Study Group
.
Am J Cardiol
.
1994
;
73
:
1069
1074
.
52
Klootwijk
P
,
Meij
S
,
Es
GV
, et al
.
Comparison of usefulness of computer assisted continuous 48-h 3-lead with 12-lead ECG ischaemia monitoring for detection and quantitation of ischaemia in patients with unstable angina
.
Eur Heart J
.
1997
;
18
(
6
):
931
940
.
53
Job
L
,
Ernst
D
.
Implementation of continuous ST-segment monitoring and mapping using the EASI 12-Lead System
.
Crit Care Nurse
.
2014
;
34
(
2
):
E39
E39
.
54
Drew
BJ
,
Califf
RM
,
Funk
M
, et al
.
AHA Scientific Statement: practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings
.
Circulation
.
2004
;
110
:
2721
2746
.
55
Leeper
B
.
Continuous ST-segment monitoring
.
AACN Clin Issues
.
2003
;
14
:
145
154
.
56
Clochesy
JM
,
Cifani
L
,
Howe
K
.
Electrode site preparation techniques: a follow up study
.
Heart Lung
.
1991
;
20
:
27
30
.
57
Kania
M
,
Rix
H
,
Fereniec
M
, et al
.
The effect of precordial lead displacement on ECG morphology
.
Med Biol Eng Comp
.
2014
;
52
(
2
):
109
119
.
58
Klootwijk
P
,
Cobbaert
C
,
Fioretti
P
,
Kint
PP
,
Simoons
ML
.
Noninvasive assessment of reperfusion and reocclusion after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction
.
Am J Cardiol
.
1993
;
72
(
19
):
G75
G84
.
59
Krucoff
MW
,
Parente
AR
,
Bottner
RK
, et al
.
Stability of multilead ST-segment “fingerprints” over time after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and its usefulness in detecting reocclusion
.
Am J Cardiol
.
1988
;
61
:
1232
1237
.
60
Kwon
K
,
Freedman
SB
,
Wilcox
I
, et al
.
The unstable ST segment early after thrombolysis for acute infarction and its usefulness as a marker of recurrent coronary occlusion
.
Am J Cardiol
.
1991
;
67
:
109
115
.
61
Drew
BJ
,
Tisdale
LA
.
ST segment monitoring for coronary artery reocclusion following thrombolytic therapy and coronary angioplasty: identification of optimal bedside monitoring leads
.
Am J Crit Care
.
1993
;
2
(
4
):
280
292
.
62
Krucoff
MW
,
Croll
MA
,
Pope
JE
, et al
.
Continuously updated 12-lead ST-segment recovery analysis for myocardial infarct artery patency assessment and its correlation with multiple simultaneous early angiographic observations
.
Am J Cardiol
.
1993
;
71
(
2
):
145
151
.
63
Steg
PG
,
James
SK
,
Atar
D
, et al
.
ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation
.
Eur Heart J
.
2012
;
33
(
20
):
2569
2619
.
64
O’Gara
PT
,
Kushner
FG
,
Ascheim
DD
, et al
.
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
2013
;
61
(
4
):
e78
e140
.
65
Caldwell
MA
,
Pelter
MM
,
Drew
BJ
.
Chest pain is an unreliable measure of ischemia in men and women during PTCA
.
Heart Lung
.
1996
;
25
(
6
):
423
429
.
66
Pope
JH
,
Aufderheide
TP
,
Ruthazer
R
, et al
.
Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department
.
N Engl J Med
.
2000
;
342
(
16
):
1163
1170
.
67
Hemsey
JK
,
Dracup
K
,
Fleischmann
K
,
Sommargren
CE
,
Drew
BJ
.
Pre-hospital 12-lead ST-segment monitoring improves the early diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome
.
J Electrocardiol
.
2012
;
45
(
3
):
266
271
.
68
Krucoff
M
.
Identification of high risk patients with silent myocardial ischemia after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by multi-lead monitoring
.
Am J Cardiol
.
1988
;
61
:
29F
34F
.
69
Zairis
MN
,
Ambrose
JA
,
Papadaki
OA
, et al
.
C-reactive protein and ST-segment monitoring by continuous 12-lead electrocardiogram in patients with primary unstable angina pectoris
.
Am J Cardiol
.
2003
;
91
(
5
):
600
603
.
70
Maas
AC
,
Wyatt
CM
,
Green
CL
, et al
.
Combining baseline clinical descriptors and real-time response to therapy: the incremental prognostic value of continuous ST-segment monitoring in acute myocardial infarction
.
Am Heart J
.
2004
;
147
(
4
):
698
704
.
71
Nørgaard
BL
,
Andersen
K
,
Thygesen
K
, et al
.
Long term risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes: characteristics of troponin T testing and continuous ST segment monitoring
.
Heart
.
2004
;
90
(
7
):
739
744
.
72
Yan
AT
,
Yan
RT
,
Tan
M
, et al
.
INTERACT Investigators. Long-term prognostic value and therapeutic implications of continuous ST-segment monitoring in acute coronary syndrome
.
Am Heart J
.
2007
;
153
(
4
):
500
506
.
73
Ottander
P
,
Nilsson
JB
,
Jensen
SM
,
Näslund
U
.
Ischemic ST-segment episodes during the initial 24 hours of ST elevation myocardial infarction predict prognosis at 1 and 5 years
.
J Electrocardiol
.
2010
;
43
(
3
):
224
229
.
74
Hamm
CW
,
Bassand
JP
,
Agewall
S
, et al
.
ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation
.
Eur Heart J
.
2011
;
32
(
23
):
2999
3054
.
75
Harkness
JR
,
Morrow
DA
,
Braunwald
E
, et al
.
Myocardial ischemia and ventricular tachycardia on continuous electrocardiographic monitoring and risk of cardiovascular outcomes after non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (from the MERLIN-TIMI 36 Trial)
.
Am J Cardiol
.
2011
;
108
(
10
):
1373
1381
.
76
Amsterdam
EA
,
Wenger
NK
,
Brindis
RG
, et al
.
2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
2014
;
64
(
24
):
e139
e228
.
77
Roffi
M
,
Patrono
C
,
Collet
JP
, et al
.
2015
ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation
.
Eur Heart J
.
2015
:
ehv320
.
78
Gunnarsson
G
,
Eriksson
P
,
Dellborg
M
.
Continuous ST-segment monitoring of patients with right bundle branch block and suspicion of acute myocardial infarction
.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol
.
2005
;
10
(
2
):
161
168
.
79
Krucoff
MW
,
Pope
JE
,
Bottner
RK
,
Renzi
RH
,
Wagner
GS
,
Kent
KM
.
Computer-assisted ST-segment monitoring: experience during and after brief coronary occlusion
.
J Electrocardiol
.
1987
;
20
(
suppl
):
15
21
.
80
Aldrich
HR
,
Hindman
NB
,
Hinohara
T
, et al
.
Identification of the optimal electrocardiographic leads for detecting acute epicardial injury in acute myocardial infarction
.
Am J Cardiol
.
1987
;
59
(
1
):
20
23
.
81
Tisdale
LA
,
Drew
BJ
.
ST segment monitoring for myocardial ischemia
.
AACN Clin Issues
.
1993
;
4
:
34
43
.
82
Haeberlin
A
,
Studer
E
,
Niederhauser
T
, et al
.
Electrocardiographic ST-segment monitoring during controlled occlusion of coronary arteries
.
J Electrocardiol
.
2014
;
47
(
1
):
29
37
.
83
Cohn
JN
,
Guiha
NH
,
Broder
MI
,
Limas
CJ
.
Right ventricular infarction: clinical and hemodynamic features
.
Am J Cardiol
.
1974
;
33
(
2
):
209
214
.
84
Erhardt
LR
,
Sjögren
A
,
Wahlberg
I
.
Single right-sided precordial lead in the diagnosis of right ventricular involvement in inferior myocardial infarction
.
Am Heart J
.
1976
;
91
(
5
):
571
576
.
85
Braat
SH
,
de Zwaan
C
,
Brugada
P
,
Coenegracht
JM
,
Wellens
HJ
.
Right ventricular involvement with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction identifies high risk of developing atrioventricular nodal conduction disturbances
.
Am Heart J
.
1984
;
107
(
6
):
1183
1187
.
86
Wellens
HJ
.
Right ventricular infarction
.
N Engl J Med
.
1993
;
328
(
14
):
1036
1038
.
87
Carter
T
,
Ellis
K
.
Right ventricular infarction
.
Crit Care Nurse
.
2005
;
25
(
2
):
52
62
.
88
London
MJ
,
Hollenberg
M
,
Wong
MG
, et al
.
Intraoperative myocardial ischemia: localization by continuous 12-lead electrocardiography
.
Anesthesiology
.
1988
;
69
(
2
):
232
241
.
89
Aberg
N
,
Sharkey
S
,
Hadfield
P
.
ST segment shift induced by body position changes during continuous 12 lead electrocardiographic ischemia monitoring in the CCU
.
Circulation
.
1991
;
84
:
4
8
.
90
Drew
BJ
,
Adams
MG
.
ST segment changes caused by body position mimicking transient myocardial ischemia: Hazards of ST segment monitoring?
J Electrocardiol
.
2001
;
34
(
3
):
261
264
.
91
Smith
SW
.
The ECG in Acute MI: An Evidence-Based Manual of Reperfusion Therapy
.
Philadelphia, PA
:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
;
2002
.
92
Wagner
GS
,
Macfarlane
P
,
Wellens
H
, et al
.
AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society
.
Circulation
.
2009
;
119
:
e262
e270
.
93
Rautaharju
PM
,
Surawicz
B
,
Gettes
LS
.
AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: Part IV, the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
2009
;
53
:
982
991
.
94
Thygesen
K
,
Alpert
JS
,
Jaffe
AS
, et al
.
Third universal definition of myocardial infarction
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
2012
;
60
(
16
):
1581
1598
.

Footnotes

Original Authors: Barbara Drew, rn, ms, phd, faan, faha, cns-bc, and Daleen Aragon, rn, phd August 2004

Contributing Authors: Karen L. Johnson, rn, phd, and Kate Moore, phd, dnp, aprn-bc, cne, ccrn, cen, agacnp-bc, anp-bc, gnp-bc April 2008

Cynthia Webner, rn, dnp, ccns, ccrn-cmc, chfn, and Karen Marzlin, rn, dnp, ccns, ccrn-cmc, chfn December 2015

Approved by the Clinical Resources Task Force, February 2016.

Financial Disclosures

None reported.