Blood pressure (BP) is measured in virtually all patients receiving health care. Accurate measurement of BP is essential to guide management decisions and prevent adverse outcomes. Noninvasive BP (NIBP) monitoring is considered a safe practice; however, complications can occur. Bruising and skin irritation from compression are the most commonly occurring complications.1  Prolonged periods of frequent NIBP measurements have been associated with rare complications, including pain, limb edema,2  phlebitis,3  compartment syndrome, peripheral neuropathy, thrombophlebitis, venous stasis, ecchymosis, and petechiae.2,3  Conditions that place patients at high risk for complications include diabetes,4,5  arterial or venous insufficiency, preexisting peripheral neuropathies, decreased limb perfusion, thrombolytic therapy, anticoagulation therapy,2  increased arm activity (eg, seizures, shivering), irregular cardiac rhythms, and decreased level of consciousness.3 

  1. Measure BP in the upper arm (between the shoulder and the elbow) using the oscillatory or auscultatory method. [level D]

  2. Use appropriate-size BP cuff and follow instructions for fit and placement per manufacturer’s recommendations. [level D]

    • If upper arms cannot be used for BP measurement or if the maximum size BP cuff does not fit the upper arm, BP may be measured in the forearm.

    • Consider use of thigh and calf for BP measurement if the upper arms and forearms cannot be used.

  3. Measure baseline BP in both upper arms. For clinically significant differences in BP (>10 mm Hg), use the arm with the higher pressure. [level D]

  4. Positioning of patient: The appropriate reference level for NIBP measurement is the heart. [level D]

    • Patient should be seated with back and arms supported, feet on floor, and legs uncrossed with upper arm at heart level (phlebostatic axis: 4th intercostal space, halfway between the anterior and posterior diameter of the chest; Figure 1).

    • If patient cannot be seated, position patient supine (Figure 2) or with head of bed at a comfortable level (Figure 3) and with upper arm supported at heart level.

  5. The patient and the caregiver should not speak while BP is being measured. [level B]

  6. Minimize complications by using the maximum (least frequent) NIBP cycle time for the shortest time period and by ensuring proper cuff placement. [level E]

Use of NIBP Monitoring

  1. Studies comparing oscillatory BPs with intraarterial6,7  and/or auscultatory BPs815  were reviewed. Each manufacturer of automatic oscillatory devices has its own algorithm for deriving systolic and diastolic pressures from the detected mean arterial pressure; readings from one device may differ from readings from another. Thus, comparison between studies is difficult if different oscillometric devices and data collection procedures are used.

  2. To promote accuracy, nurses should use oscillatory devices that meet the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards (mean difference, ± 5 mm Hg and standard deviation ≤8 mm Hg when compared with auscultatory method)16  and the appropriate size cuff.

  3. Stiffness of the arteries, particularly in older patients, also influences amplitude of the oscillations and may cause underestimation of mean arterial pressure.8,15  Accuracy of the automated device may also be limited if patients are hypertensive,8  hypotensive,10  and/or have cardiac dysrhythmia.17 

  4. With beat-to-beat variation in BP in patients with atrial fibrillation, both auscultation and oscillatory BP measurements may vary, and there are recommendations to perform 3 consecutive measurements in outpatient settings.18  Studies are limited, with marked heterogeneity, and have yielded varied results to either recommend or not recommend the use of oscillatory BP measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation.17,19 

Cuff Size and Placement

  1. Selection of a BP cuff of the appropriate size is necessary for accurate measurement of BP. Studies have shown that the use of a cuff that is too narrow results in an overestimation of BP, and a cuff that is too wide yields underestimates of BP. A falsely high pressure reading may result when the cuff is too small relative to the patient’s arm circumference. If the cuff is too large, falsely low pressure readings can result. A cuff with a bladder of an adequate size capable of going around 80% of the arm is recommended.16,2022  If the thigh or calf is used, the same attention to selection of proper cuff size is necessary.

  2. Research has shown that BP measurements in the forearm and upper arm are not interchangeable. If the forearm is used, selection of the proper cuff size and positioning of the forearm at the level of the heart are necessary.2330 

  3. Results of comparisons of automatic, NIBP measurements in the upper arm and calf of adults vary. Overall systolic BP measurements were higher in the calf than the arm in patients undergoing surgery, colonoscopy, and caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.3133  Differences in mean BP and diastolic BP were not consistent. Large differences for some individuals make it difficult to devise a predictive formula that would be applicable in all situations.34  In adults, calf BPs should be used only if the upper arm or forearm are not accessible31,35  or if the appropriate size cuff is not available.

  4. Although no evidence-based research is available, multiple guidelines and patient education sources state reasons why an extremity may not be suitable for BP measurement. Reasons include deep vein thrombosis, grafts, ischemic changes, arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous grafts, and peripherally inserted central catheters or midline catheters.3340  For patients who have had a mastectomy or lumpectomy, do not use the involved arm(s) for BP measurements if lymphedema is present.20,41 

  5. Wrap cuff snugly around upper arm so that the end of the cuff is 2 to 3 cm above the antecubital fossa to allow room for placement of the stethoscope for manual BP measurement.20  Align the cuff to ensure that the mark on the cuff for artery is placed over the artery.

  6. If using the forearm, position the cuff midway between the elbow and the wrist. If using the calf, position the lower edge of the cuff approximately 2.5 cm above the malleoli. If using the thigh, position the cuff over the lower third of the thigh so that the lower edge of the cuff is approximately 2 to 3 cm above the popliteal fossa.31,35 

  7. Calf BP measurement is also referred to as an ankle BP. If a stethoscope is used, Korotkoff sounds are auscultated over either the dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial artery (for calf BP) or the popliteal artery (for thigh BP).

  8. Patients with aortic dissection, congenital heart disease, coarctation of the aorta, peripheral vascular disease, and unilateral neurological and musculoskeletal abnormalities may demonstrate a difference in BP between the 2 arms.21,22  Additionally, research has shown that up to 20% to 40% of persons without the just-listed conditions may also have a measurable difference of 10 to 20 mm Hg in systolic and diastolic BP between the left and right arms.2022  Research methods included oscillatory or auscultatory BP measurements, with both methods yielding similar findings. Age was a factor in one study21  with higher mean differences in both systolic BP and diastolic BP in older participants. If there is a consistent interarm difference, use the arm with the higher pressure.20 

Positioning of Patients

  1. Body position and arm position influence the measurement of BP.20,42,43  With the arm placed at heart level and the patient supine, the systolic BP readings are approximately 8 mm Hg higher than with the patient sitting.20,44,45  Studies also show that if the arm is below the level of the right atrium or “heart level,” the BP readings will be higher. Conversely, if the arm is above heart level, the BP readings will be lower. This mean BP difference of up to 10 mm Hg when the arm is not at heart level is attributed to the effects of hydrostatic pressure.20,44,45 

  2. For calf BP measurements, position the patient supine.29,30  Place the patient prone for thigh BP measurements. If the patient cannot be placed prone, position the patient supine with knee slightly bent.29,30 

  3. Systolic and diastolic BPs of hypertensive and normotensive patients increase with talking.45 

Patient Safety

  1. To minimize complications, ensure proper cuff placement. The cuff should not be placed over a bony prominence, superficial nerve,46  or joint. Use the maximum (least frequent) NIBP cycle time for the shortest time period possible. During prolonged monitoring, inspect the cuff site and extremity3,47  and consider alternating between limbs.2  Consider arterial pressure monitoring for prolonged surgery, severe hypotension, and shock.3 

Determine the best site and method of NIBP measurement for your patient.

Use the appropriate size cuff for the patient’s size and the extremity to ensure the best results.

Follow your facility’s procedures for BP measurement, including documentation of site and interarm differences.

Promptly report any BP monitoring equipment or cuffs that are not working properly and take them out of service until they can be inspected by the biomedical department.

Ensure appropriate positioning of patients during BP measurement.

Compare acquired values with the actual assessment of the patient and his or her clinical condition.

Evaluate skin at the site and circulation in the extremity being used for BP measurement.

Make sure that all personnel are competent in use of the types of equipment available on your unit.

  1. Contact a clinical practice specialist for additional information: go to www.aacn.org/practice-resource-network.

1
Dobbin
KR
.
Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring
.
Crit Care Nurse
.
2002
;
22
(
2
):
123
124
.
2
Srinivasan
C
,
Kuppuswamy
B
.
Rahbomyolysis complicating non-invasive blood pressure measurement
.
Indian J Anasth
.
2012
;
56
:
428
430
.
3
Sutin
KM
,
Longaker
MT
.
Acute biceps compartment syndrome associated with the use of a noninvasive blood pressure monitor
.
Anesth Analg
.
1996
;
83
:
1345
1346
.
4
Chester
MW
,
Barwise
JA
,
Holzman
MD
,
Pandharipande
P
.
Acute dermal capillary rupture associated with noninvasive blood pressure monitoring
.
J Clin Anesth
.
2007
;
19
:
473
475
.
5
Uzun
G
,
Karagoz
H
,
Mutloglu
M
, et al
.
Non-invasive blood pressure cuff induced lower extremity wound in a diabetic patients
.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
.
2012
;
16
:
707
708
.
6
Bur
A
,
Hirschl
M
,
Herkner
H
, et al
.
Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement according to the relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference in critically ill patients
.
Crit Care Med
.
2000
;
28
:
371
376
.
7
Bur
A
,
Herknew
H
,
Vicek
M
, et al
.
Factors influencing the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients
.
Crit Care Med
.
2003
;
31
:
793
799
.
8
Braam
RL
,
Thien
T
.
Is the accuracy of blood pressure measuring devices underestimated at increasing blood pressure levels?
Blood Press Monit
.
2005
;
10
:
283
289
.
9
Chang
JJ
,
Rabinowitz
D
,
Shea
S
.
Sources of variability in blood pressure measurement using the Dinamap PRO 100 automated oscillometric device [abstract]
.
Am J Epidemiol
.
2003
;
158
:
1218
1226
.
10
Davis
J
,
Davis
I
,
Bennink
LD
, et al
.
Are automatic blood pressure measurements accurate in trauma patients?
J Trauma
.
2003
;
55
:
860
863
.
11
Parker
SB
,
Steigerwalk
SP
.
The Dinamap dilemma: inaccuracy of the commonly used Dinamap 8100 compared to simultaneous mercury manometer measurement in hospitalized patients at different levels of blood pressure [abstract]
.
Am J Hypertens
.
2004
;
17
(
suppl 1
):
S52
.
12
Shahriari
M
,
Rotenberg
DK
,
Nielsen
JK
, et al
.
Measurement of arm blood pressure using different oscillometry manometers compared to auscultatory readings [abstract]
.
Blood Press
.
2003
;
12
:
155
159
.
13
Terra
SG
,
Blum
RA
,
Wei
G
, et al
.
Concordance and variability of blood pressure measurement between automated and manual readings in subjects receiving phenylephrine [abstract]
.
Clin Pharmacol Ther
.
2003
;
73
:
P71
.
14
van Montfrans
GA
.
Oscillometric blood pressure measurement: progress and problems
.
Blood Press Monit
.
2001
;
6
:
287
290
.
15
van Popele
NM
,
Bos
WJ
,
de Beer
NAM
, et al
.
Arterial stiffness as underlying mechanism of disagreement between an oscillometric blood pressure monitor and a sphygmomanometer
.
Hypertension
.
2000
;
36
:
484
488
.
16
Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI)
.
Manual, Electronic, or Automated Sphygmomanometers
.
ANSI/AAMI SP10
.
Arlington, VA
:
AAMI
;
2002
.
17
Stergiou
G
,
Kollias
A
,
Destrounis
A
, et al
.
Automated blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
J Hypertens
.
2012
;
30
:
2074
2080
.
18
The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
.
2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
.
J Hypertens
.
2013
;
31
:
1281
1357
.
19
Pagonas
N
,
Schmidt
S
,
Eysel
J
, et al
.
Impact of atrial fibrillation on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring
.
Hypertension
.
2013
;
62
:
579
584
.
20
Pickering
TG
,
Hall
JE
,
Appel
LJ
, et al
.
Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals, part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans—a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research
.
Hypertension
.
2005
;
45
:
142
161
.
21
Lane
D
,
Beevers
M
,
Barnes
N
, et al
.
Inter-arm differences in blood pressure: when are they clinically significant?
J Hypertens
.
2002
;
20
:
1089
1095
.
22
Cassidy
P
,
Jones
K
.
A study of inter-arm blood pressure differences in primary care
.
J Hypertens
.
2001
;
5
:
519
522
.
23
Palatini
P
,
Longo
D
,
Toffanin
G
, et al
.
Wrist blood pressure overestimates blood pressure measured at the upper arm
.
Blood Press Monit
.
2004
;
9
:
77
81
.
24
Pierin
AM
,
Alavarce
DC
,
Gusmao
JL
, et al
.
Blood pressure measurement in obese patients: comparison between upper arm and forearm measurements
.
Blood Press Monit
.
2004
;
9
:
101
105
.
25
Domiano
K
,
Hinch
S
,
Savinskie
D
, et al
.
Comparison of upper arm and forearm blood pressure
.
Clin Nurs Res
.
2008
;
17
:
241
250
.
26
Schell
K
,
Bradley
E
,
Bucher
L
, et al
.
A clinical comparison of forearm and upper arm automatic, noninvasive blood pressures
.
Am J Crit Care
.
2005
;
14
:
232
241
.
27
Schell
K
,
Lyons
D
,
Bradley
E
, et al
.
Clinical comparison of automatic, noninvasive measurements of blood pressure in the forearm and upper arm with the patient supine or with the heads of the bed raised 45 degrees: a follow-up study
.
Am J Crit Care
.
2006
;
15
:
196
205
.
28
Schimanski
K
,
Jull
A
,
Mitchell
N
, et al
.
Comparison of upper arm and forearm non-invasive blood pressure in adult emergency department patients
.
Int J Nurs Stud
.
2014
;
51
(
12
):
1575
1584
.
29
Schrauf
C
.
Monitoring blood pressure: do method and body location matter?
Nephrol Nurs J
.
2013
;
39
:
502
512
.
30
Rauen
C
,
Chulay
M
,
Bridges
E
,
Vollman
KM
,
Arbour
R
.
Seven evidence- based practice habits: putting some sacred cows out to pasture
.
Crit Care Nurse
.
2008
;
28
(
2
):
98
124
.
31
Jarvis
C
.
Physical Examination and Health Assessment
. 6th ed.
St Louis, MO
:
Elsevier
;
2012
:
136
141
.
32
Wilkes
JM
,
DiPalma
JA
,
Brachial blood pressure monitoring versus ankle monitoring during colonoscopy
.
South Med J
.
2004
;
97
:
939
941
.
33
Intravenous Nurses Society
.
Arteriovenous fistulas and hemodialysis catheters
.
J Infus Nurs
.
2006
;
29
:
S46
S47
.
34
Zahn
J
,
Bernstein
H
,
Hossain
S
, et al
.
Comparison of noninvasive blood pressure measurements on the arm and calf during cesarean delivery
.
J Clin Monit Comput
.
2000
;
16
:
557
562
.
35
Lippincott On Line Procedure Manual
.
Blood pressure assessment
.
2014
. In:
Lippincott procedures
. . Accessed October 30, 2014.
36
National Kidney Foundation/Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative
.
Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access
.
Am J Kidney Dis
.
2001
;
37
:
S137
S181
.
37
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
.
Vascular access for hemodialysis
. . Accessed March 14, 2016.
38
National Kidney Foundation
.
KDOQI Clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for 2006 updates: hemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis adequacy, and vascular access
.
Am J Kidney Dis
.
2006
;
48
:
S1
S32
.
39
Rushing
J
.
Caring for a patient’s vascular access for hemodialysis
.
Nurs Manage
.
2010
;
41
(
10
):
47
.
40
Infusion Nursing Society
.
INS infusion spotlight: PICC management
. . Accessed October 12, 2014.
41
American Cancer Society
.
Lymphedema: what every woman with breast cancer should know
. . Accessed March 10, 2016.
42
Peters
GL
,
Binder
SK
,
Campbell
NR
.
The effects of crossing legs on blood pressure: a randomized single-blind cross-over study
.
Blood Press Monit
.
1999
;
4
:
97
101
.
43
Keele-Smith
R
,
Price-Daniel
C
.
Effects of crossing legs on blood pressure measurement
.
Clin Nurs Res
.
2001
;
10
:
202
213
.
44
Netea
RT
,
Elving
LD
,
Lutterman
JA
,
Thien
T
.
Body position and blood pressure measurement in patients with diabetes mellitus
.
J Intern Med
.
2002
;
251
:
393
399
.
45
Netea
RT
,
Lenders
JW
,
Smits
P
,
Thien
T
.
Influence of body and arm position on blood pressure readings: an overview
.
J Hypertension
.
2003
;
21
(
2
):
237
241
.
46
Lin
CC
,
Jawan
B
,
de Villa
MV
,
Chen
FC
,
Liu
PP
.
Blood pressure cuff compression injury of the radial nerve
.
J Clin Anesth
.
2001
;
13
:
306
308
.
47
Devbhandari
MP
,
Shariff
Z
,
Duncan
AJ
.
Skin necrosis in a critically ill patient due to a blood pressure cuff
.
J Postgrad Med
.
2006
;
52
:
136
138
.

Footnotes

Reviewed and approved by the AACN Clinical Resources Task Force, December 2015

Financial Disclosures

None reported.