Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), and central venous pressure (CVP) may aid in the differential diagnosis in pulmonary hypertension14  and may be beneficial in complex shock states.5  Less invasive hemodynamic methods, in conjunction with the patient’s medical history, may also be useful in the differential diagnosis of cardiogenic shock.6 

The appropriate use of pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)–guided therapy is associated with decreased mortality in patients with refractory heart failure/cardiogenic shock7  but is not associated with improved outcomes in patients with less severe heart failure. In trauma patients, PAC-guided therapy may benefit older, more severely injured patients, but use of a PAC is not associated with improved outcomes in other trauma populations.8,9  Use of a PAC is not associated with improved outcomes in other populations, including high-risk cardiothoracic surgery10  and general intensive care unit (ICU) patients, although many studies are more than 20 years old.11 

The addition of CVP monitoring to guided therapy is not associated with improved outcomes in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.1216  The PAOP and CVP are not accurate for identifying which patients will respond to a fluid bolus with an increase in stroke volume, and alternative methods such as functional hemodynamic indicators should be used.1719  Although the CVP has been identified as a fixed target for resuscitation, debate remains about whether CVP, if used at all, should more appropriately be considered a stopping point.20,21 

Use of PACs has decreased, particularly in nonsurgical ICUs.22  This decreased use indicates a need for alternative training methods, such as simulation, to maintain proficiency in PAP monitoring if continued use of PACs is anticipated.

  1. Monitor for complications during catheter insertion (arrhythmias), identify patients at increased risk for pulmonary artery rupture/infarction, and implement preventive actions to decrease risk for catheter-induced pulmonary artery rupture or infarction. [level D]

  2. Verify the accuracy of the invasive pressure monitoring system by performing a square waveform test at the beginning of each shift and any time the system has been disturbed (eg, when obtaining blood samples). [level D]

  3. Obtain PAP/PAOP/CVP with the patient supine with the head of bed (HOB) elevated between 0° and 60°; with the patient in 20°, 30°, or 90° lateral position with the HOB at 0°; or with the patient prone. Allow the patient to stabilize for 5 to 15 minutes after a position change. Note that a longer stabilization period may be needed if the patient is prone. [level B]

  4. Level and reference the transducer’s air/fluid interface to the phlebostatic axis (fourth inter-costal space half the diameter of the chest) with the patient supine or prone, or with the patient on his or her side (provided that the correct angle-specific reference is verified by using a laser or carpenter’s level before PAP/PAOP/CVP measurements). [level B]

  5. Obtain PAP/PAOP/CVP measurements from a graphic (analog) tracing at end-expiration. [level B] If an analog method is not available, use the stop-cursor method with concurrent airway tracing. [level B] Any automated transfer of hemodynamic data from the monitor to the electronic health record should be verified.

  6. With airway pressure release ventilation (APRV), patients breathe spontaneously around the upper pressure limit; thus, the airway pressure tracing is used to identify spontaneous end-expiration, which occurs immediately before the release of airway pressure and the initiation of inspiration. [level C]

  7. If a patient is actively exhaling or there is marked respiratory excursion (> 10–15 mm Hg), measure the PAOP/CVP at a point halfway between the peak and the nadir pressures. [level C]

  8. Use a simultaneous electrocardiographic (ECG) tracing to assist with proper PAP/PAOP/CVP waveform identification. [level C]

  9. PACs can be safely withdrawn and removed by competent registered nurses. [level D]

  10. Accurate alternatives to measuring CVP include measuring peripheral venous pressure (PVP); PVP measurements are obtained from a catheter in the dorsum of the hand or forearm, or from a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). [level C]

  11. Continuity from the peripheral venous catheter tip to the central circulation should be verified by checking for an increase in the PVP in response to circumferential occlusion of the arm or leg proximal to the catheter or in response to a sustained inspiratory breath or Valsalva maneuver. [level C]

Monitor for Complications During Catheter Insertion and Use

  1. Complications associated with pulmonary artery catheterization are most commonly associated with central venous access; however, approximately 20% of patients experience transient arrhythmias during insertion of a PAC. Right-sided and complete heart block (most likely in patients with preexisting left bundle branch block) occur in 0.3% to 3.8% of patients. Life-threatening complications (pulmonary artery rupture, pulmonary infarction) have been reported in 0.3% to 3% of patients.11,23,24 

  2. Contraindications for placement of a PAC include presence of a left bundle branch block (risk for complete heart failure), right-sided cardiac mass, tricuspid or pulmonic valve endocarditis, or presence of a mechanical tricuspid or pulmonic valve.23  Severe tricuspid regurgitation may prevent catheter advancement.23 

  3. Caution should be taken in placement and PAOP measurements in patients at increased risk for pulmonary artery rupture (eg, age >60 years, pulmonary hypertension, improper catheter position [catheter insertion >55 cm], cardiopulmonary bypass, and anticoagulation).23  In addition, incorrect balloon inflation (eg, over-wedging or forced inflation) and failure to deflate the balloon increase the risk for pulmonary artery rupture and thrombosis. In patients at increased risk for pulmonary artery rupture, the end-diastolic pressure in the pulmonary artery should be measured rather than PAOP.

System Assessment to Ensure Accurate Measurement

  1. Correct preparation of the pressure monitoring system is required to ensure accurate pressure measurements. The square waveform test, or dynamic response test, determines the ability of the transducer system to correctly reflect invasive pressures.25,26  The dynamic response is affected by system problems, such as air bubbles in the tubing, excessive tubing length, loose connections, and catheter patency. Removal of microbubbles during system setup results in an “adequate” or “optimal” system in more than 95% of cases.26,27  Any of these problems can affect the accuracy of PAP/PAOP/CVP measurements and must be corrected before pressure measurement. Perform the square waveform test on initial setup, at least once each shift, after opening the catheter system (eg, for zeroing, collecting a blood sample, or changing tubing), and whenever the PAP/PAOP/CVP waveform appears to be damped or distorted.28 

  2. The addition of a blood conservation device or a needleless access port adversely affects the dynamic response characteristics of invasive pressure monitoring systems.26,29,30  The use of a damping device may improve the dynamic response characteristics of the system under these conditions.31,32  There are no standards that address the use of blood conservation devices on central catheters, but the effect of devices on the dynamic response characteristics should be considered in any decision.

  3. Consider the following changes in PAPs as clinically significant (ie, not reflective of the normal variability in PAP): change in pulmonary artery systolic pressure greater than 4 to 7 mm Hg, change in pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure (PAEDP) greater than 4 to 7 mm Hg, and change in PAOP greater than 4 mm Hg.3335  All hemodynamic values should be interpreted in the context of the patient’s condition. Changes in waveform configuration indicate a need for reassessment of the patient and support the need for documentation of actual waveforms in the patient’s record.

Positioning of Patients

  1. Supine: Results of studies in a variety of populations of patients indicate that PAP/PAOP/CVP measurements are comparable when the patient is supine with the HOB elevated to any angle between 0° and 60°, or when the patient is in a 20°, 30°, or 90° lateral position with the HOB flat, as long as the correct angle-specific reference is used.36  PAP/PAOP/CVP measurements obtained with patients in Trendelenburg or reverse Trendelenburg position are not comparable to measurements obtained with the patient supine.3742  The response to sitting with the legs in a dependent position is variable, and measurements made with patients in that position may not be comparable to measurements obtained with the patient supine.4346  PAP, CVP, and cardiac index47  values obtained with the patient in the seated legs-dependent position should be compared with measurements obtained with the patient supine with backrest elevation.

  2. Prone: Patients may be placed prone as a part of therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or during surgical procedures. In patients with ARDS, if adequate time is allowed for stabilization (30–60 minutes) after repositioning, positioning patients prone does not cause any clinically significant differences in measurements of PAP, CVP, or cardiac output.4854  However, variable responses in PAP, PAOP, CVP, and cardiac index may occur depending on whether the patient is a fluid responder or nonresponder.5557 

    • In studies done to evaluate the effects of prone positioning of patients on hemodynamic indices, the midaxillary line or the midanteroposterior diameter of the chest has been used as the reference point, although no study has been done to validate this reference point.4854  A reference point 5 cm vertical distance below the sternal angle may be more accurate with the patient prone.57 

  3. Rotating beds: No studies have be done in patients in automated proning beds. Studies are needed to describe the effects of the prone/lateral rotation with the bed flat and the prone/reverse Trendelenburg position on hemodynamic indices.

  4. Reliable measurements of cardiac output have been obtained only with patients positioned supine with the backrest at 20° or 45° and with patients prone. Clinically significant changes in cardiac output may occur in the 20° lateral position, which may limit concurrent measurements of PAP/PAOP/CVP and cardiac output. Because responses to a given position vary from patient to patient, use a standardized approach to evaluate each patient’s PAP/PAOP/CVP compared with measurements obtained with the patient in the flat, supine position.

Waveform Assessment and Interpretation

  1. Correct and consistent waveform interpretation is required to ensure accurate pressure measurements. A simultaneous ECG should be used to facilitate correct PAP/PAOP/CVP waveform measurement5860  and should be read from an analog tracing or the stop cursor method, if an analog tracing is not available.6163 

  2. Digital readouts should not be used because they reflect pressures obtained throughout respiration and may be significantly different from end-expiratory pressures.6466 

  3. Registered nurses who demonstrate competency can safely withdraw and/or remove PACs. Before incorporating withdrawing and/or removing PACs into nursing practice, verify that it is in your state’s scope of practice for registered nurses.67 

Alternative Sites for Monitoring

  1. Peripheral venous pressure (PVP), which is obtained from a catheter in the dorsum of the hand, forearm, or lower extremity, may be an accurate alternative to CVP. In a variety of populations of patients receiving mechanical ventilation and spontaneously breathing patients (neurosurgical, laparoscopic, colorectal, cardiac, kidney and hepatic transplant, burns),6875  and a variety of positions (supine, Fowler, Trendelenburg, prone),76,77  the PVP was higher than the CVP by approximately 2 or 3 mm Hg. Research in the postoperative and ICU setting is limited. In all positions, continuity from the catheter tip to central circulation must be confirmed by evaluation of an increase in the PVP in response to circumferential occlusion of the arm or leg proximal to the catheter,70,78  a sustained inspiratory breath,76,78  or a Valsalva maneuver.71,77  If continuity is absent (no increase in PVP in response to test), the PVP cannot be used and the catheter should be assessed for patency.71,78  The arm and shoulder should be placed in a neutral position, if possible.79 

  2. Femoral venous pressure-CVP. Femoral (inferior vena caval or iliac venous) venous pressure agrees with the CVP if abdominal pressure is low.8082  If abdominal pressure (eg, bladder pressure) is increased (≥ 15 mm Hg), the femoral pressure will correlate with abdominal pressure, but will not agree with CVP.8385  If using femoral venous/inferior vena caval pressure, confirm that intra-abdominal pressure is less than 15 mm Hg. The difference between CVP and femoral venous pressure is not related to catheter type (introducer, multilumen)80  but is affected by HOB elevation (recommended to position the patient supine-flat or <30° HOB elevation during pressure measurements).86 

  3. The CVP can be obtained from a PICC. A continuous flow device (3 mL/h) should be used. The PICC should be referenced at the phlebostatic axis.8791  A shallow slope following a fast flush suggests PICC occlusion.88  The CVP obtained from PICCs that support high-pressure infusions such as infusions of radiographic contrast media is also accurate.89 

Effect of Ventilation on Measurement

  1. In patients with pulmonary hypertension, a PAOP greater than 15 mm Hg is an adequate predictor of a left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) exceeding 15 mm Hg; although absolute values of PAOP and LVEDP may differ 3 to 7 mm Hg on average.92  In patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension (mean PAP ≥ 25 mm Hg with normal left ventricular function), the PAOP may be an overestimate of the LVEDP, especially in obese patients or patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.9395  When measuring the PAOP, use end-expiratory analog measurement66  and ensure complete occlusion without overwedging (eg, PAOP < PAEDP; atrial pressure waveform, free flow within catheter to confirm the tip is not impacted on the vessel wall, highly oxygenated blood [capillary] is obtained from distal port with balloon inflated).96,97 

  2. Pressure support ventilation (PSV): During PSV, use the proximal airway pressure to identify end-expiration, as the type of ventilation (spontaneous, pressure control) varies depending on the level of pressure support being provided. In one study,64  conversion from pressure control ventilation to a spontaneous respiratory pattern occurred at PSV of about 12 cm H2O.

  3. Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV): The effect of APRV on hemodynamic measurements has been evaluated in only 1 study (animal model).98  The PAP and left atrial pressure agreed at continuous positive airway pressures from 10 to 35 cm H2O. Both the PAOP and left atrial pressure increased as the airway pressure increased, which suggests a need to correct cardiac pressures for increased airway pressure (> 10 cm H2O). No research on this topic has been done in humans; however, patients on APRV breathe spontaneously around the upper pressure limit; thus, the airway pressure tracing may be used to identify spontaneous end-expiration, which occurs immediately before the release of airway pressure and the initiation of inspiration.

  4. Active exhalation/large respiratory swings. Debate persists on how to interpret PAP/PAOP in patients with active exhalation or large respiratory excursions (eg, respiratory-induced fluctuation in PAOP >10–15 mm Hg). Under these conditions, end-expiratory pressures are overestimates of the true PAP/PAOP.99  With active exhalation/large respiratory excursions, the PAP/PAOP should be consistently read at the midpoint between the peak and the nadir pressures99  or averaged over 3 ventilatory cycles.100 

Always identify and mark the phlebostatic axis or appropriate angle-specific reference.

Measure PAP/PAOP/CVP with the patient supine (HOB elevated between 0° and 60°), in lateral position (20°, 30°, or 90°), or prone.

Perform a square waveform test at appropriate intervals as determined by your unit protocol.

Read pressures from an analog recording at end-expiration. However, if analog recording is not available, use a stop-cursor method with a concurrent ECG and respiratory waveform to identify end-expiration.

Confirm accuracy of hemodynamic data transferred from the monitor to the electronic health record and provide documentation of waveform recordings to allow evaluation of changes in waveform patterns.

  1. Contact a clinical practice specialist for additional information: go to www.aacn.org then select Practice Resource Network.

  2. AACN Hemodynamic Management Pocket Reference Card. Product 400751. http://www.aacn.org/dm/Products/ProductDetails.aspx?productid=400751&prodtyp=product&subsystem=ORD.

  3. Lough ME. Hemodynamic Monitoring: Evolving Technologies and Clinical Practice. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2016.

1
Vincent
JL
,
Rhodes
A
,
Perel
A
, et al
.
Clinical review: update on hemodynamic monitoring—a consensus of 16
.
Crit Care
.
2011
;
15
:
229
.
2
Leuchte
HH
,
Baezner
CJ
,
Baumgartner
RA
,
Mernitz
P
,
Neurohr
C
,
Behr
J
.
Acute hemodynamic responses to supplemental oxygen and their prognostic implications in pulmonary hypertension
.
Respiration
.
2013
;
85
:
400
407
.
3
Grignola
JC
.
Hemodynamic assessment of pulmonary hypertension
.
World J Cardiol
.
2011
;
3
:
10
17
.
4
Maron
BA
.
Hemodynamics should be the primary approach to diagnosing, following, and managing pulmonary arterial hypertension
.
Can J Cardiol
.
2015
;
31
:
515
520
.
5
De Backer
D
,
Fagnoul
D
,
Herpain
A
.
The role of invasive techniques in cardiopulmonary evaluation
.
Curr Opin Crit Care
.
2013
;
19
:
228
233
.
6
Cooper
HA
,
Najafi
AH
,
Ghafourian
K
, et al
.
Diagnosis of cardiogenic shock without the use of a pulmonary artery catheter
.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care
.
2015
;
4
:
88
95
.
7
Sotomi
Y
,
Sato
N
,
Kajimoto
K
, et al
.
Impact of pulmonary artery catheter on outcome in patients with acute heart failure syndromes with hypotension or receiving inotropes: from the ATTEND Registry
.
Int J Cardiol
.
2014
;
172
:
165
172
.
8
Friese
RS
,
Shafi
S
,
Gentilello
LM
.
Pulmonary artery catheter use is associated with reduced mortality in severely injured patients: a National Trauma Data Bank analysis of 53,312 patients
.
Crit Care Med
.
2006
;
34
:
1597
1601
.
9
Barmparas
G
,
Inaba
K
,
Georgiou
C
, et al
.
Swan-Ganz catheter use in trauma patients can be reduced without negatively affecting outcomes
.
World J Surg
.
2011
;
35
:
1809
1817
.
10
Chiang
Y
,
Hosseinian
L
,
Rhee
A
,
Itagaki
S
,
Cavallaro
P
,
Chikwe
J
.
Questionable benefit of the pulmonary artery catheter after cardiac surgery in high-risk patients
.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
.
2015
;
29
:
76
81
.
11
Rajaram
SS
,
Desai
NK
,
Kalra
A
, et al
.
Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
.
2013
;
2
:
CD003408
.
12
ProCess Investigators
,
Yealy
DM
,
Kellum
JA
, et al
.
A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock
.
N Engl J Med
.
2014
;
370
:
1683
1693
.
13
ARISE Investigators, ANZICS Clinical Trials Group
,
Peake
SL
, et al
.
Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock
.
N Engl J Med
.
2014
;
371
:
1496
1506
.
14
Mouncey
PR
,
Osborn
TM
,
Power
GS
, et al
.
Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock
.
N Engl J Med
.
2015
;
372
:
1301
1311
.
15
Angus
DC
,
Barnato
AE
,
Bell
D
, et al
.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: the ARISE, ProCESS and ProMISe Investigators
.
Intensive Care Med
.
2015
;
41
(
9
):
1549
1560
.
16
Rusconi
AM
,
Bossi
I
,
Lampard
JG
,
Szava-Kovats
M
,
Bellone
A
,
Lang
E
.
Early goal-directed therapy vs usual care in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Intern Emerg Med
.
2015
;
10
(
6
):
731
743
.
17
Cherpanath
TG
,
Aarts
LP
,
Groeneveld
JA
,
Geerts
BF
.
Defining fluid responsiveness: a guide to patient-tailored volume titration
.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
.
2014
;
28
:
745
754
.
18
Marik
PE
,
Cavallazzi
R
.
Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense
.
Crit Care Med
.
2013
;
41
:
1774
1781
.
19
Sondergaard
S
,
Parkin
G
,
Aneman
A
.
Central venous pressure: we need to bring clinical use into physiological context
.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
.
2015
;
59
:
552
560
.
20
Pinsky
MR
,
Kellum
JA
,
Bellomo
R
.
Central venous pressure is a stopping rule, not a target of fluid resuscitation
.
Crit Care Resusc
.
2014
;
16
:
245
246
.
21
Polderman
KH
,
Varon
J
,
Marik
PE
.
Fluid management decisions should not be guided by fixed central venous pressure targets
.
Am J Emerg Med
.
2015
;
33
:
1311
.
22
Gershengorn
HB
,
Wunsch
H
.
Understanding changes in established practice: pulmonary artery catheter use in critically ill patients
.
Crit Care Med
.
2013
;
41
:
2667
2676
.
23
Evans
DC
,
Doraiswamy
VA
,
Prosciak
MP
, et al
.
Complications associated with pulmonary artery catheters: a comprehensive clinical review
.
Scand J Surg
.
2009
;
98
:
199
208
.
24
Practice guidelines for pulmonary artery catheterization: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Pulmonary Artery Catheterization
.
Anesthesiology
.
2003
;
99
:
988
1014
.
25
Bridges
E
,
Middleton
R
.
Direct arterial vs oscillometric monitoring of blood pressure: stop comparing and pick one (a decision-making algorithm)
.
Crit Care Nurse
.
1997
;
17
:
58
72
.
26
Bridges
E
,
Evers
KG
,
Schmelz
J
,
Woods
S
,
Harrington
E
.
Invasive pressure monitoring at altitude
.
Crit Care Med
.
2005
;
33
:
A13
.
27
Bridges
EJ
.
Pulmonary artery pressure monitoring: when, how, and what else to use
.
AACN Adv Crit Care
.
2006
;
17
:
286
303
.
28
Gardner
R
.
Direct blood pressure measurement: dynamic response requirements
.
Anesthesiology
.
1981
;
54
:
227
236
.
29
Melamed
R
,
Johnson
K
,
Pothen
B
,
Sprenkle
MD
,
Johnson
PJ
.
Invasive blood pressure monitoring systems in the ICU: influence of the blood-conserving device on the dynamic response characteristics and agreement with noninvasive measurements
.
Blood Press Monit
.
2012
;
17
:
179
183
.
30
Gore
S
,
Middleton
R
,
Bridges
E
.
Analysis of an algorithm to guide decision making regarding direct and oscillometric blood pressure measurement [abstract]
.
Am J Resp Crit Care Med
.
1995
;
151
:
A331
.
31
Fujiwara
S
,
Kawakubo
Y
,
Mori
S
,
Tachihara
K
,
Toyoguchi
I
,
Yokoyama
T
.
Effect of Planecta and ROSE on the frequency characteristics of blood pressure-transducer kits
.
J Clin Monit Comput
.
2015
;
29
:
681
689
.
32
Fujiwara
S
,
Tachihara
K
,
Mori
S
, et al
.
Effect of using a Planecta port with a three-way stopcock on the natural frequency of blood pressure transducer kits [published online October 14, 2015]
.
J Clin Monit Comput
. doi:.
33
Nemens
EJ
,
Woods
SL
.
Normal fluctuations in pulmonary artery and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in acutely ill patients
.
Heart Lung
.
1982
;
11
:
393
398
.
34
Moser
D
,
Woo
M
.
Normal fluctuation in pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction [abstract]
.
Am J Crit Care
.
1996
;
5
:
236
.
35
Bridges
EJ
,
Woods
SL
,
Brengelmann
GL
,
Mitchell
P
,
Laurent-Bopp
D
.
Effect of the 30 degree lateral recumbent position on pulmonary artery and pulmonary artery wedge pressures in critically ill adult cardiac surgery patients
.
Am J Crit Care
.
2000
;
9
:
262
275
.
36
Rauen
CA
,
Makic
MB
,
Bridges
E
.
Evidence-based practice habits: transforming research into bedside practice
.
Crit Care Nurse
.
2009
;
29
:
46
59
.
37
Yoneda
G
,
Katagiri
S
,
Yamamoto
M
.
Reverse Trendelenburg position is a safer technique for lowering central venous pressure without decreasing blood pressure than clamping of the inferior vena cava below the liver
.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
.
2015
;
22
:
463
466
.
38
Mekis
D
,
Kamenik
M
.
Influence of body position on hemodynamics in patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery
.
Wien Klin Wochenschr
.
2010
;
122
(
suppl 2
):
59
62
.
39
Lestar
M
,
Gunnarsson
L
,
Lagerstrand
L
,
Wiklund
P
,
Odeberg-Wernerman
S
.
Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45 degrees Trendelenburg position
.
Anesth Analg
.
2011
;
113
:
1069
1075
.
40
Rosendal
C
,
Markin
S
,
Hien
MD
,
Motsch
J
,
Roggenbach
J
.
Cardiac and hemodynamic consequences during capnoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning: lessons learned from robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
.
J Clin Anesth
.
2014
;
26
:
383
389
.
41
van Lieshout
JJ
,
Harms
MP
,
Pott
F
,
Jenstrup
M
,
Secher
NH
.
Stroke volume of the heart and thoracic fluid content during head-up and head-down tilt in humans
.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
.
2005
;
49
:
1287
1292
.
42
Reuter
DA
,
Felbinger
TW
,
Schmidt
C
, et al
.
Trendelenburg positioning after cardiac surgery: effects on intrathoracic blood volume index and cardiac performance
.
Eur J Anaesthesiol
.
2003
;
20
:
17
20
.
43
Woods
SL
,
Mansfield
LW
.
Effect of body position upon pulmonary artery and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures in noncritically ill patients
.
Heart Lung
.
1976
;
5
:
83
90
.
44
Fournier
P
,
Mensch-Dechene
J
,
Ranson-Bitker
B
,
Valladares
W
,
Lockhart
A
.
Effects of sitting up on pulmonary blood pressure, flow, and volume in man
.
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol
.
1979
;
46
:
36
40
.
45
Thadani
U
,
Parker
JO
.
Hemodynamics at rest and during supine and sitting bicycle exercise in normal subjects
.
Am J Cardiol
.
1978
;
41
:
52
59
.
46
Thadani
U
,
West
RO
,
Mathew
TM
,
Parker
JO
.
Hemodynamics at rest and during supine and sitting bicycle exercise in patients with coronary artery disease
.
Am J Cardiol
.
1977
;
39
:
776
783
.
47
Rader
C
,
Nelson
M
,
Sobek
C
, et al
.
Cardiac index based on measurements obtained in a bedside chair and in bed
.
Am J Crit Care
.
2011
;
20
:
210
215
.
48
Blanch
I
,
Mancebo
J
,
Perez
M
, et al
.
Short-term effects of prone position in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
.
Intensive Care Med
.
1997
;
23
:
1033
1039
.
49
Jolliet
P
,
Bulpa
P
,
Chevrolet
JC
.
Effects of the prone position on gas exchange and hemodynamics in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome
.
Crit Care Med
.
1998
;
26
:
1977
1985
.
50
Vollman
K
,
Bander
J
.
Improved oxygenation using a prone positioner in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
.
Intensive Care Med
.
1996
;
22
:
1105
1111
.
51
Hering
R
,
Wrigge
H
,
Vorwerk
R
, et al
.
The effects of prone positioning on intraabdominal pressure and cardiovascular and renal function in patients with acute lung injury
.
Anesth Analg
.
2001
;
92
:
1226
1231
.
52
Hering
R
,
Vorwerk
R
,
Wrigge
H
, et al
.
Prone positioning, systemic hemodynamics, hepatic indocyanine green kinetics, and gastric intramucosal energy balance in patients with acute lung injury
.
Intensive Care Med
.
2002
;
28
:
53
58
.
53
Matejovic
M
,
Rokyta
R
Jr
,
Radermacher
P
,
Krouzecky
A
,
Sramek
V
,
Novak
I
.
Effect of prone position on hepato-splanchnic hemodynamics in acute lung injury
.
Intensive Care Med
.
2002
;
28
:
1750
1755
.
54
Borelli
M
,
Lampati
L
,
Vascotto
E
,
Fumagalli
R
,
Pesenti
A
.
Hemodynamic and gas exchange response to inhaled nitric oxide and prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients
.
Crit Care Med
.
2000
;
28
:
2707
2712
.
55
Jozwiak
M
,
Teboul
JL
,
Anguel
N
, et al
.
Beneficial hemodynamic effects of prone positioning in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
.
2013
;
188
:
1428
1433
.
56
Wu
CY
,
Lee
TS
,
Chan
KC
,
Jeng
CS
,
Cheng
YJ
.
Does targeted pre-load optimisation by stroke volume variation attenuate a reduction in cardiac output in the prone position
.
Anaesthesia
.
2012
;
67
:
760
764
.
57
Magder
S
.
Is all on the level? Hemodynamics during supine versus prone ventilation
.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
.
2013
;
188
:
1390
1391
.
58
Lipp-Ziff
E
,
Kawanishi
D
.
A technique for improving the accuracy of the pulmonary artery diastolic pressure as an estimate of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure
.
Heart Lung
.
1991
;
20
:
107
115
.
59
Magder
S
.
How to use central venous pressure measurements
.
Curr Opin Crit Care
.
2005
;
11
:
264
270
.
60
Bridges
EJ
.
Monitoring pulmonary artery pressures: just the facts
.
Crit Care Nurse
.
2000
;
20
:
59
78
.
61
Johnson
MK
,
Schumann
L
.
Comparison of three methods of measurement of pulmonary artery catheter readings in critically ill patients
.
Am J Crit Care
.
1995
;
4
:
300
307
.
62
Lundstedt
JL
.
Comparison of methods of measuring pulmonary artery pressure
.
Am J Crit Care
.
1997
;
6
:
324
332
.
63
Ahrens
TS
,
Schallom
L
.
Comparison of pulmonary artery and central venous pressure waveform measurements via digital and graphic measurement methods
.
Heart Lung
.
2001
;
30
:
26
38
.
64
Wong
FW
.
Where is end expiration? Measuring PAWP when the patient is on pressure support ventilation
.
Dynamics (Pembroke, Ont)
.
2010
;
21
:
11
16
.
65
Pasion
E
,
Good
L
,
Tizon
J
, et al
.
Evaluation of the monitor cursor-line method for measuring pulmonary artery and central venous pressures
.
Am J Crit Care
.
2010
;
19
:
511
521
.
66
Ryan
JJ
,
Rich
JD
,
Thiruvoipati
T
,
Swamy
R
,
Kim
GH
,
Rich
S
.
Current practice for determining pulmonary capillary wedge pressure predisposes to serious errors in the classification of patients with pulmonary hypertension
.
Am Heart J
.
2012
;
163
:
589
594
.
67
Epping
K
,
Hammer
B
.
Removal of a pulmonary artery catheter in the presence of implanted leads
.
Crit Care Nurse
.
2012
;
32
:
69
71
.
68
Amar
D
,
Melendez
JA
,
Zhang
H
,
Dobres
C
,
Leung
DH
,
Padilla
RE
.
Correlation of peripheral venous pressure and central venous pressure in surgical patients
.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
.
2001
;
15
:
40
43
.
69
Kim
SH
,
Park
SY
,
Cui
J
, et al
.
Peripheral venous pressure as an alternative to central venous pressure in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery
.
Br J Anaesth
.
2011
;
106
:
305
311
.
70
Munis
JR
,
Bhatia
S
,
Lozada
LJ
.
Peripheral venous pressure as a hemodynamic variable in neurosurgical patients
.
Anesth Analg
.
2001
;
92
:
172
179
.
71
Bombardieri
AM
,
Beckman
J
,
Shaw
P
,
Girardi
FP
,
Ma
Y
,
Memtsoudis
SG
.
Comparative utility of centrally versus peripherally transduced venous pressure monitoring in the perioperative period in spine surgery patients
.
J Clin Anesth
.
2012
;
24
:
542
548
.
72
Tugrul
M
,
Camci
E
,
Pembeci
K
,
Al-Darsani
A
,
Telci
L
.
Relationship between peripheral and central venous pressures in different patient positions, catheter sizes, and insertion sites
.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
.
2004
;
18
:
446
450
.
73
Hadimioglu
N
,
Ertug
Z
,
Yegin
A
,
Sanli
S
,
Gurkan
A
,
Demirbas
A
.
Correlation of peripheral venous pressure and central venous pressure in kidney recipients
.
Transplant Proc
.
2006
;
38
:
440
442
.
74
Hoftman
N
,
Braunfeld
M
,
Hoftman
G
,
Mahajan
A
.
Peripheral venous pressure as a predictor of central venous pressure during orthotopic liver transplantation
.
J Clin Anesth
.
2006
;
18
:
251
255
.
75
Sherif
L
,
Joshi
VS
,
Ollapally
A
,
Jain
P
,
Shetty
K
,
Ribeiro
KS
.
Peripheral venous pressure as a reliable predictor for monitoring central venous pressure in patients with burns
.
Indian J Crit Care Med
.
2015
;
19
:
199
202
.
76
Tobias
JD
.
Measurement of central venous pressure from a peripheral intravenous catheter in the prone position during spinal surgery
.
South Med J
.
2009
;
102
:
256
259
.
77
Memtsoudis
SG
,
Jules-Elysse
K
,
Girardi
FP
, et al
.
Correlation between centrally versus peripherally transduced venous pressure in prone patients undergoing posterior spine surgery
.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
.
2008
;
33
:
E643
E647
.
78
Cox
P
,
Johnson
J
,
Tobias
J
.
Measurement of central venous pressure from a peripheral intravenous catheter in the lower extremity
.
South Med J
.
2005
;
98
:
698
702
.
79
Stoneking
L
,
Deluca
LA
Jr
,
Fiorello
AB
,
Munzer
B
,
Baker
N
,
Denninghoff
KR
.
Alternative methods to central venous pressure for assessing volume status in critically ill patients
.
J Emerg Nurs
.
2014
;
40
:
115
123
.
80
Lee
BK
,
Lee
HY
,
Jeung
KW
,
Jung
YH
,
Lee
GS
.
Estimation of central venous pressure using inferior vena caval pressure from a femoral endovascular cooling catheter
.
Am J Emerg Med
.
2013
;
31
:
240
243
.
81
Boone
BA
,
Kirk
KA
,
Tucker
N
,
Gunn
S
,
Forsythe
R
.
Iliac venous pressure estimates central venous pressure after laparotomy
.
J Surg Res
.
2014
;
191
:
203
207
.
82
Walsh
JT
,
Hildick-Smith
DJ
,
Newell
SA
,
Lowe
MD
,
Satchithananda
DK
,
Shapiro
LM
.
Comparison of central venous and inferior vena caval pressures
.
Am J Cardiol
.
2000
;
85
:
518
520
,
A11
.
83
Ait-Oufella
H
,
Boelle
PY
,
Galbois
A
, et al
.
Comparison of superior vena cava and femoroiliac vein pressure according to intra-abdominal pressure
.
Ann Intensive Care
.
2012
;
2
:
21
.
84
Groombridge
CJ
,
Duplooy
D
,
Adams
BD
,
Paul
E
,
Butt
W
.
Comparison of central venous pressure and venous oxygen saturation from venous catheters placed in the superior vena cava or via a femoral vein: the numbers are not interchangeable
.
Crit Care Resusc
.
2011
;
13
:
151
155
.
85
Markou
N
,
Grigorakos
L
,
Myrianthefs
P
, et al
.
Venous pressure measurements in the superior and inferior vena cava: the influence of intra-abdominal pressure
.
Hepatogastroenterology
.
2004
;
51
:
51
55
.
86
Pacheco
S
,
Machado
MN
,
Amorim
RC
, et al
.
Central venous pressure in femoral catheter: correlation with superior approach after heart surgery
.
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc
.
2008
;
23
:
488
493
.
87
Yun
JY
,
Park
SH
,
Cho
DS
,
Jeung
HJ
,
Lee
SA
,
Seo
SJ
.
Comparison of the central venous pressure from internal jugular vein and the pressure measured from the peripherally inserted antecubital central catheter (PICCP) in liver transplantation recipients
.
Korean J Anesthesiol
.
2011
;
61
:
281
287
.
88
Black
IH
,
Blosser
SA
,
Murray
WB
.
Central venous pressure measurements: peripherally inserted catheters versus centrally inserted catheters
.
Crit Care Med
.
2000
;
28
:
3833
3836
.
89
Latham
HE
,
Rawson
ST
,
Dwyer
TT
,
Patel
CC
,
Wick
JA
,
Simpson
SQ
.
Peripherally inserted central catheters are equivalent to centrally inserted catheters in intensive care unit patients for central venous pressure monitoring
.
J Clin Monit Comput
.
2012
;
26
:
85
90
.
90
McLemore
EC
,
Tessier
DJ
,
Rady
MY
, et al
.
Intraoperative peripherally inserted central venous catheter central venous pressure monitoring in abdominal aortic aneurysm reconstruction
.
Ann Vasc Surg
.
2006
;
20
:
577
581
.
91
Alansari
M
,
Hijazi
M
.
Central venous pressure from peripherally inserted central catheters correlates well with that of centrally inserted central catheters [abstract]
.
Chest
.
2004
;
126
:
873s
.
92
Halpern
SD
,
Taichman
DB
.
Misclassification of pulmonary hypertension due to reliance on pulmonary capillary wedge pressure rather than left ventricular end-diastolic pressure
.
Chest
.
2009
;
136
:
37
43
.
93
Bitar
A
,
Selej
M
,
Bolad
I
,
Lahm
T
.
Poor agreement between pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in a veteran population
.
PLoS One
.
2014
;
9
:
e87304
.
94
LeVarge
BL
,
Pomerantsev
E
,
Channick
RN
.
Reliance on end-expiratory wedge pressure leads to misclassification of pulmonary hypertension
.
Eur Respir J
.
2014
;
44
:
425
434
.
95
de Oliveira
RK
,
Ferreira
EV
,
Ramos
RP
, et al
.
Usefulness of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure as a correlate of left ventricular filling pressures in pulmonary arterial hypertension
.
J Heart Lung Transplant
.
2014
;
33
:
157
162
.
96
Leatherman
JW
,
Shapiro
RS
.
Overestimation of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in pulmonary hypertension due to partial occlusion
.
Crit Care Med
.
2003
;
31
:
93
97
.
97
Morris
AH
,
Chapman
RH
,
Gardner
RM
.
Frequency of technical problems encountered in the measurement of pulmonary artery wedge pressure
.
Crit Care Med
.
1984
;
12
:
164
170
.
98
Slim
AM
,
Martinho
S
,
Slim
J
,
Davenport
E
,
Castillo-Rojas
LM
,
Shry
EA
.
The effect of airway pressure release ventilation on pulmonary catheter readings: specifically pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in a swine model [published online February 24, 2011]
.
Anesthesiol Res Pract
.
2011
;
2011
:
371594
. doi:.
99
Hoyt
JD
,
Leatherman
JW
.
Interpretation of the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with large respiratory excursions in intrathoracic pressure
.
Intensive Care Med
.
1997
;
23
:
1125
1131
.
100
Boerrigter
BG
,
Waxman
AB
,
Westerhof
N
,
Vonk-Noordegraaf
A
,
Systrom
DM
.
Measuring central pulmonary pressures during exercise in COPD: how to cope with respiratory effects
.
Eur Respir J
.
2014
;
43
:
1316
1325
.

Footnotes

Original Author: Elizabeth Bridges, RN, PhD, CCNS May 2004

Contributing Authors: Lia Barros, rn, bsn, ccrn, Elizabeth Bridges, rn, phd, ccns, Marie Cockerham, rn, bsn, ccrn, Sheryl Greco, rn, mn, ccrn, Farah Herrera, rn, bsn, ccrn, and Nicole Solvang, rn, bsn, ccrn

Reviewed and approved by the AACN Clinical Resources Task Force, December 2015

Financial Disclosures

None reported.